Jones Barry T, Jones Ben C, Smith Helena, Copley Nicola
Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK.
Addiction. 2003 Feb;98(2):235-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00270.x.
To apply a new paradigm using transient changes to visual scenes to explore information processing biases relating to "social" levels of alcohol and cannabis use.
Male and female student volunteers (n = 200) not self-reporting substance-related problems.
Quiet testing areas throughout the university campus.
A flicker paradigm, for inducing change blindness with lighter and heavier social users of alcohol (experiment 1, n= 100) and social users and non-users of cannabis (experiment 2, n= 100), explored the associations between habitual level of use and the latency to detection of a single substance-related or neutral change made to a scene of grouped substance-related and neutral objects.
Alcohol use was measured as the number of units of the heaviest drinking day from the previous week; cannabis use as the number of months of use in previous 12. Change-detection latency comparisons were used to evaluate processing biases.
In both experiments, (i) heavier social users detected substance-related changes quicker than lighter and non-users; (ii) lighter and non-users detected substance-neutral changes quicker than heavier users; (iii) heavier social users detected substance-related quicker than substance-neutral changes; and (iv) lighter and non-users detected substance-neutral changes quicker than substance-related changes.
Alcohol and cannabis processing biases are found at levels of social use, have the potential to influence future consumption and for this reason merit further research.
应用一种利用视觉场景的瞬态变化的新范式,以探索与酒精和大麻“社交”使用水平相关的信息处理偏差。
未自我报告与物质相关问题的男女学生志愿者(n = 200)。
大学校园内的安静测试区域。
一种闪烁范式,用于诱导酒精使用量较大和较小的社交使用者(实验1,n = 100)以及大麻社交使用者和非使用者(实验2,n = 100)出现变化盲视,该范式探索了习惯性使用水平与检测对一组与物质相关和中性物体的场景所做的单个与物质相关或中性变化的潜伏期之间的关联。
酒精使用量通过前一周饮酒量最大那天的单位数来衡量;大麻使用量通过前12个月的使用月数来衡量。变化检测潜伏期比较用于评估处理偏差。
在两个实验中,(i)酒精使用量较大的社交使用者比使用量较小的使用者和非使用者更快地检测到与物质相关的变化;(ii)使用量较小的使用者和非使用者比使用量较大的使用者更快地检测到与物质无关的变化;(iii)酒精使用量较大的社交使用者检测与物质相关的变化比检测与物质无关变化更快;(iv)使用量较小的使用者和非使用者检测与物质无关的变化比检测与物质相关的变化更快。
在社交使用水平上发现了酒精和大麻的处理偏差它们有可能影响未来的消费,因此值得进一步研究。