Verslavingszorg Noord Nederland, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 27;15(1):e0228272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228272. eCollection 2020.
Cognitive models emphasise the importance of attentional bias in addiction. However, many attentional bias tasks have been criticised for questionable psychometric properties and inability to differentiate between engagement and disengagement processes. This study therefore examined the suitability of two alternative tasks for assessing attentional bias within the context of alcohol use. Participants were undergraduate students (N = 169) who completed the Visual Search Task and Odd-One-Out Task, the latter of which is designed to differentiate between engagement and disengagement processes of attention, at baseline and one week later. Participants also completed baseline measures of alcohol consumption, craving, and alcohol use problems. Internal consistency was adequate for the Visual Search Task index, and weak for the Odd-One-Out Task indices. Test-retest reliability was weak for both tasks. The Visual Search Task index and the disengagement (but not the engagement) index of the Odd-One-Out Task showed a positive association with alcohol consumption. This study was restricted to a non-clinical student sample. The relatively high error rate of the Odd-One-Out Task might have reduced its sensitivity as an index of attentional bias. Both tasks showed some merit as attentional bias measures, and results suggested that attentional disengagement might be particularly related to alcohol use. However, the reliability of the current measures was inadequate. One potential explanation for the low reliability is that non-clinical samples may have weak and unstable attentional biases to alcohol. Future efforts should be made to improve the psychometric qualities of both tasks and to administer them in a clinical sample.
认知模型强调了注意偏向在成瘾中的重要性。然而,许多注意偏向任务因其可疑的心理测量特性和无法区分参与和脱离过程而受到批评。因此,本研究考察了两种替代任务在评估酒精使用背景下的注意偏向的适用性。参与者为本科生(N=169),他们在基线和一周后分别完成视觉搜索任务和异类排除任务,后者旨在区分注意力的参与和脱离过程。参与者还在基线时完成了酒精消费、渴望和酒精使用问题的测量。视觉搜索任务指数的内部一致性是足够的,异类排除任务的参与和脱离指数的内部一致性是弱的。两个任务的重测信度都较弱。视觉搜索任务指数和异类排除任务的脱离(而非参与)指数与酒精消费呈正相关。本研究仅限于非临床学生样本。异类排除任务的相对较高错误率可能降低了其作为注意偏向指数的敏感性。这两个任务都显示出作为注意偏向测量的一些优点,结果表明注意脱离可能与酒精使用特别相关。然而,目前这些测量的可靠性是不够的。一个可能的解释是,非临床样本可能对酒精的注意偏向较弱且不稳定。未来的努力应致力于提高这两个任务的心理测量质量,并在临床样本中进行管理。