Bonsignore M R, Morici G, Vignola A M, Riccobono L, Bonanno A, Profita M, Abate P, Scichilone N, Amato G, Bellia V, Bonsignore G
Institute of Medicine and Pneumology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2003 Jan;33(1):14-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01557.x.
Inflammatory cells are increased in the airways of endurance athletes, but their role in causing exercise-induced respiratory symptoms and bronchoconstriction, or their possible long-term consequences, are uncertain.
To put the results of athlete studies in perspective, by analysing the pathogenesis of airway cell changes and their impact on respiratory function.
Athletes of different endurance sports at rest showed increased airway neutrophils. Elite swimmers and skiers also showed large increases in airway eosinophils and lymphocytes, possibly related to chronic, exercise-related exposure to irritants or cold and dry air, respectively. Post-exercise studies reported variable responses of airway cells to exercise, but found no evidence of inflammatory cell activation in the airways, at variance with exercise-induced neutrophil activation in peripheral blood. The increase in airway inflammatory cells in athletes can result from hyperventilation-induced increase in airway osmolarity stimulating bronchial epithelial cells to release chemotactic factors. Hyperosmolarity may also inhibit activation of inflammatory cells by causing shedding of adhesion molecules, possibly explaining why airway inflammation appears 'frustrated' in athletes. Data on exhaled nitric oxide are few and variable, not allowing conclusions about its usefulness as a marker of airway inflammation in athletes, or its role in modulating bronchial responsiveness.
The acute and long-term effects of exercise on airway cells need further study. Airway inflammatory cells are increased but not activated in athletes, both at rest and after exercise, and airway inflammation appears to regress in athletes quitting competitions. Altogether, these findings do not clearly indicate that habitual intense exercise may be detrimental for respiratory health. Rather, airway changes may represent chronic adaptive responses to exercise hyperventilation. An improved understanding of the effects of exercise on the airways will likely have a clinical impact on sports medicine, and on the current approach to exercise-based rehabilitation in respiratory disease.
耐力运动员气道中的炎症细胞增多,但其在引发运动诱发的呼吸道症状和支气管收缩中的作用,或其可能产生的长期后果尚不确定。
通过分析气道细胞变化的发病机制及其对呼吸功能的影响,正确看待运动员研究的结果。
不同耐力运动项目的运动员在静息状态下气道中性粒细胞增多。优秀游泳运动员和滑雪运动员气道嗜酸性粒细胞和淋巴细胞也大幅增加,可能分别与长期、与运动相关的刺激物暴露或寒冷干燥空气暴露有关。运动后研究报告了气道细胞对运动的不同反应,但未发现气道中有炎症细胞激活的证据,这与外周血中运动诱发的中性粒细胞激活不同。运动员气道炎症细胞增多可能是由于过度通气导致气道渗透压升高,刺激支气管上皮细胞释放趋化因子。高渗也可能通过导致黏附分子脱落来抑制炎症细胞的激活,这可能解释了为什么运动员的气道炎症似乎“受阻”。关于呼出一氧化氮的数据较少且不一致,无法得出其作为运动员气道炎症标志物的有用性或其在调节支气管反应性中的作用的结论。
运动对气道细胞的急性和长期影响需要进一步研究。运动员在静息和运动后气道炎症细胞增多但未被激活,并且在退出比赛的运动员中气道炎症似乎会消退。总体而言,这些发现并未明确表明习惯性剧烈运动可能对呼吸健康有害。相反,气道变化可能代表对运动性过度通气的慢性适应性反应。更好地理解运动对气道的影响可能会对运动医学以及目前呼吸系统疾病基于运动的康复方法产生临床影响。