Suppr超能文献

阿司匹林用于发作性紧张型头痛:与对乙酰氨基酚的安慰剂对照剂量范围比较

Aspirin in episodic tension-type headache: placebo-controlled dose-ranging comparison with paracetamol.

作者信息

Steiner T J, Lange R, Voelker M

机构信息

Division of Neuroscience, Imperial College London, UK.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2003 Feb;23(1):59-66. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2003.00470.x.

Abstract

Most people with episodic tension-type headache (TTH) treat themselves with over-the-counter analgesics. In the absence of clear evidence of dose-related efficacy of the two most commonly used analgesics, aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and paracetamol (acetaminophen), this study compared two doses of each with placebo. In a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized parallel-groups comparative trial, 638 consenting subjects aged 16-65 years with episodic TTH (but not migraine) by IHS criteria were recruited from the UK general population by advertisement. They treated one episode of moderate or severe TTH with a single dose of 500 or 1000 mg aspirin, 500 or 1000 mg paracetamol or placebo. The primary objective was to compare aspirin 1000 mg with placebo, and the primary end-point was subjective pain relief (total or worthwhile) 2 h after treatment ('response'). Additionally, pain intensity on a 100-mm visual analogue scale and functional impairment were monitored regularly for 4 h and at 24 h, although rescue medication was allowed after 2 h. The analysis was of the intention-to-treat population of 542 who took treatment (all providing outcome data). Treatment groups were matched at baseline. Aspirin 1000 mg (75.7% response rate; P = 0.0009) and to a lesser extent aspirin 500 mg (70.3%; P = 0.011) and paracetamol 1000 mg (71.2%; P = 0.007), but not paracetamol 500 mg (63.8%; P = 0.104), were statistically more effective than placebo despite a high placebo-response rate (54.5%). Outcome was not affected by headache intensity at baseline. Secondary end-points including functional recovery (by median times of 4.0-13.5 h) were consistent with these findings, although a minority of subjects recorded long-duration functional impairment (37-54 h). Adverse events reported by 13.4-18.9% of subjects were mild or moderate, and transient. No safety concerns arose.

摘要

大多数发作性紧张型头痛(TTH)患者会自行使用非处方镇痛药进行治疗。鉴于两种最常用的镇痛药阿司匹林(乙酰水杨酸)和对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)缺乏明确的剂量相关疗效证据,本研究对这两种药物的两种剂量与安慰剂进行了比较。在一项双盲、双模拟、随机平行组对照试验中,通过广告从英国普通人群中招募了638名年龄在16至65岁之间、符合国际头痛协会(IHS)标准的发作性TTH(而非偏头痛)患者。他们用单剂量的500或1000毫克阿司匹林、500或1000毫克对乙酰氨基酚或安慰剂治疗一次中度或重度TTH发作。主要目的是比较1000毫克阿司匹林与安慰剂,主要终点是治疗后2小时的主观疼痛缓解(完全缓解或有价值缓解)(“反应”)。此外,尽管2小时后允许使用急救药物,但在4小时和24小时定期监测100毫米视觉模拟量表上的疼痛强度和功能损害情况。分析针对的是542名接受治疗(均提供结局数据)的意向性治疗人群。各治疗组在基线时匹配。1000毫克阿司匹林(有效率75.7%;P = 0.0009),500毫克阿司匹林(有效率70.3%;P = 0.011)和1000毫克对乙酰氨基酚(有效率71.2%;P = 0.007)在统计学上比安慰剂更有效,尽管安慰剂有效率也较高(54.5%),但500毫克对乙酰氨基酚(有效率63.8%;P = 0.104)则不然。结局不受基线时头痛强度的影响。包括功能恢复(中位时间为4.0至13.5小时)在内的次要终点与这些结果一致,尽管少数受试者记录了长时间的功能损害(37至54小时)。13.4%至18.9%的受试者报告的不良事件为轻度或中度,且为短暂性。未出现安全性问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验