Wattanapayungkul Pranee, Yap Adrian U J
Department of Restorative, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Oper Dent. 2003 Jan-Feb;28(1):15-9.
A number of "high power" in-office bleaching products have recently been re-introduced into the market. The use of such strong oxidizing agents has raised questions as to possible adverse effects on tooth structure and restorative materials. This study evaluated the effects of 35% carbamide peroxide (Opalescence Quick) and 35% hydrogen peroxide (Opalescence Xtra) on the surface finish of four tooth-colored restorative materials (Spectrum TPH, Dyract AP, Reactmer and Fuji II LC). Twenty-seven matrix-finished specimens of each material were fabricated, stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for seven days and randomly divided into three groups. Specimens in Group 1 were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C (control). Specimens in Groups 2 and 3 were treated with 35% carbamide peroxide and 35% hydrogen peroxide, respectively. A total of three 30-minute bleaching sessions were conducted at one-week intervals. Storage medium during the hiatus period was distilled water at 37 degrees C. Surface roughness measurements were carried out using profilometry after each bleaching session. Data was analyzed using ANOVA/Scheffe's test at a 0.05 significance level. No significant difference in surface roughness was observed between the bleached and the control groups for all materials. In-office bleaching products are not detrimental to the surface finish of composites, compomers, giomers and resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
近期,一些“高浓度”诊室美白产品重新进入市场。这类强氧化剂的使用引发了关于其对牙齿结构和修复材料可能产生的不良影响的疑问。本研究评估了35%过氧化脲(皓齿快速美白剂)和35%过氧化氢(皓齿超强美白剂)对四种牙齿颜色修复材料(Spectrum TPH、Dyract AP、Reactmer和富士II LC)表面光洁度的影响。每种材料制作27个经基质处理的标本,在37℃蒸馏水中储存7天,然后随机分为三组。第1组标本在37℃蒸馏水中储存(对照)。第2组和第3组标本分别用35%过氧化脲和35%过氧化氢处理。每隔一周共进行三次30分钟的美白疗程。间歇期的储存介质为37℃蒸馏水。每次美白疗程后使用轮廓仪进行表面粗糙度测量。数据采用方差分析/谢费检验在0.05显著性水平下进行分析。所有材料的漂白组和对照组之间在表面粗糙度上均未观察到显著差异。诊室美白产品对复合材料、复合体、聚酸改性复合树脂和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的表面光洁度无害。