Canay Senay, Cehreli Murat C
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 May;89(5):474-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022391303001689.
Bleaching agents may affect the color of existing composite restorations.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of 10% carbamide peroxide and 10% hydrogen peroxide on the color of light-polymerized hybrid, macrofilled, and polyacid-modified composites.
Two light-polymerized hybrid composites (3M Valux and Spectrum TPH), 1 macrofilled condensable composite (Solitaire), and 2 polyacid-modified composites (Dyract AP and Compoglass) were used. The hybrid composites served as controls. The color of 8 specimens of each material was analyzed by use of a spectrophotometer before bleaching. The specimens were then divided randomly into 2 subgroups (n=4). One group was immersed in 10% carbamide peroxide solution and the other in 10% hydrogen peroxide, for 8 hours each for 14 consecutive days. After bleaching, color changes (Delta E) were determined for each material and compared by use of the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Mann-Whitney U test (P<.05).
After bleaching with carbamide peroxide, the color changes (Delta E) for Dyract AP (2.18; SD = 1.41), Compoglass (1.14; SD = 0.26) and Solitaire (1.56; SD = 0.89) were higher than the color changes recorded for 3M Valux (0.63; SD = 3.60), and Spectrum TPH (0.66; SD = 1.24). The differences between materials bleached with carbamide peroxide were not statistically significant. After bleaching with hydrogen peroxide, the color changes for Dyract AP (9.39; SD = 0.53) and Compoglass (5.15; SD = 0.52) were higher than the changes recorded for Spectrum TPH (4.53; SD = 1.53) and 3M Valux (3.41; SD = 4.40), whereas the color change of Solitaire (3.69; SD = 0.57) was significantly higher than that of 3M Valux (P=.01). The color changes for all restorative materials tested were clinically detectable after the application of 10% hydrogen peroxide. However, clinically noticeable discoloration was observed only for Dyract AP treated with 10% carbamide peroxide.
In comparison to 10% carbamide peroxide, 10% hydrogen peroxide caused more color changes in the composites tested.
漂白剂可能会影响现有的复合树脂修复体的颜色。
本研究的目的是比较10%过氧化脲和10%过氧化氢对光固化混合型、大颗粒填料型和含氟复合树脂颜色的影响。
使用两种光固化混合型复合树脂(3M Valux和Spectrum TPH)、1种大颗粒填料型可压实复合树脂(Solitaire)以及2种含氟复合树脂(Dyract AP和Compoglass)。混合型复合树脂作为对照。在漂白前,使用分光光度计分析每种材料的8个样本的颜色。然后将样本随机分为2个亚组(n = 4)。一组浸泡在10%过氧化脲溶液中,另一组浸泡在10%过氧化氢中,每组连续浸泡8小时,共14天。漂白后,测定每种材料的颜色变化(ΔE),并使用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行比较,随后进行Mann-Whitney U检验(P <.05)。
用过氧化脲漂白后,Dyract AP(2.18;标准差 = 1.41)、Compoglass(1.14;标准差 = 0.26)和Solitaire(1.56;标准差 = 0.89)的颜色变化(ΔE)高于3M Valux(0.63;标准差 = 3.60)和Spectrum TPH(0.66;标准差 = 1.24)记录的颜色变化。用过氧化脲漂白的材料之间的差异无统计学意义。用过氧化氢漂白后,Dyract AP(9.39;标准差 = 0.53)和Compoglass(5.15;标准差 = 0.5)的颜色变化高于Spectrum TPH(4.53;标准差 = 1.53)和3M Valux(3.41;标准差 = 4.40)记录的变化,而Solitaire(3.69;标准差 = 0.57)的颜色变化显著高于3M Valux(P =.01)。在应用10%过氧化氢后,所有测试的修复材料的颜色变化在临床上均可检测到。然而,仅在用10%过氧化脲处理的Dyract AP中观察到临床上明显的变色。
与10%过氧化脲相比,10%过氧化氢在测试的复合树脂中引起更多的颜色变化。