Strasberg Steven M
Section of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in Saint Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9(5):543-7. doi: 10.1007/s005340200071.
Biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still a serious problem. Injury occurs as a result of technical errors or misidentification of ducts. Inexperience, inflammation, and aberrant anatomy are key risk factors. The most serious technical problem is cautery-induced injury. This problem may be avoided by use of cautery under very low power settings in the triangle of Calot. Misidentification injuries occur when the surgeon mistakes the common bile duct or an aberrant right hepatic duct for the cystic duct. This error usually occurs when the surgeon uses the "infundibular" technique to identify the cystic duct. This technique, which depends on seeing the cystic duct flare as it becomes the infundibulum, is especially prone to be misleading in the face of acute inflammation. This technique is unreliable and should not be used alone for anatomic identification of the ducts. It is preferable to use the critical view technique or to perform a cholangiogram.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的胆管损伤仍是一个严重问题。损伤是由技术失误或胆管误认所致。经验不足、炎症和解剖变异是关键危险因素。最严重的技术问题是电灼引起的损伤。在胆囊三角区使用极低功率的电灼可避免此问题。当外科医生将胆总管或异常的右肝管误认成胆囊管时,就会发生误认损伤。这种错误通常发生在外科医生使用“漏斗状”技术来识别胆囊管时。该技术依赖于观察胆囊管变为漏斗状时的扩张情况,在急性炎症情况下特别容易产生误导。此技术不可靠,不应单独用于胆管的解剖识别。最好采用关键视野技术或进行胆管造影。