• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安全入路批判性视角揭示的解剖学模式:希腊安全腹腔镜胆囊切除术类型学特别工作组(HETALCHO)的提议

Anatomical Schemata Revealed by the Critical View of Safety Approach: A Proposal of the Hellenic Task Force on the Typology of Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (HETALCHO).

作者信息

Papagoras Dimitris, Douridas Gerasimos, Panagiotou Dimitrios, Toutouzas Konstantinos, Lykoudis Panagis, Charalabopoulos Alexandros, Korkolis Dimitrios, Alexiou Konstantinos, Sikalias Nikolaos, Lytras Dimitrios, Papavramidis Theodosios, Tepetes Konstantinos, Avgerinos Konstantinos, Arnaoutos Spyridon, Stamou Konstantinos, Lolis Evangelos, Zacharoulis Dimitrios, Zografos Georgios, Glantzounis Georgios

机构信息

Surgical Department, General Hospital of Trikala, 421 00 Trikala, Greece.

Surgical Clinic Thriasio Hospital Elefsina, 190 18 Elefsina, Greece.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Nov 29;60(12):1968. doi: 10.3390/medicina60121968.

DOI:10.3390/medicina60121968
PMID:39768849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11677053/
Abstract

: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the most commonly performed operation in general surgery in the Western World. Gallbladder surgery, although most of the time simple, always offers the possibility of unpleasant surprises. Despite progress, the incidence of common bile duct injury is 0.2-0.4%, causing devastating implications for the patient and the surgeon. This is mainly due to the failure to identify the normal anatomy properly. The literature review reveals a lack of structured knowledge in the surgical anatomy of cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to develop a framework with a common anatomical language for safe laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. The Hellenic Task Force group on the typology for Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy performed a critical review of the literature on the laparoscopic anatomy of cholecystectomy. The results were compared with those of a clinical study of 279 patients undergoing LC for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease. Fourteen elements encountered during LC under the critical view of safety (CVS) approach were determined. The typical vascular-biliary pedicle with one cystic duct distributed laterally (or caudally) and one cystic artery medially (or cranially) lying at any point of the hepatocystic space was found in 66% of the cases studied. Anatomical schemata were formulated corresponding to the norm and four variations. The proposed cognitive anatomical schemata summarize simply what one can expect in terms of deviation from the norm. We believe that the synergy between the correct application of the CVS and the structured knowledge of the surgical anatomy in cholecystectomy helps the surgeon to handle non-typical structures safely and to complete the laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy without vascular-biliary injuries.

摘要

腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是西方世界普通外科中最常进行的手术。胆囊手术虽然大多数时候操作简单,但总是存在出现意外情况的可能性。尽管取得了进展,但胆总管损伤的发生率仍为0.2 - 0.4%,这给患者和外科医生带来了灾难性的后果。这主要是由于未能正确识别正常解剖结构。文献综述显示,在胆囊切除手术解剖学方面缺乏结构化知识。本研究的目的是为安全的腹腔镜和开放胆囊切除术开发一个具有通用解剖学语言的框架。希腊安全腹腔镜胆囊切除术类型学特别工作组对胆囊切除腹腔镜解剖学的文献进行了批判性综述。将结果与一项针对279例因单纯症状性胆结石疾病接受LC手术患者的临床研究结果进行了比较。确定了在安全关键视野(CVS)方法下LC过程中遇到的14个要素。在66%的研究病例中发现典型的血管-胆管蒂,其中一条胆囊管向外侧(或尾侧)分布,一条胆囊动脉向内侧(或头侧)分布,位于肝胆囊间隙的任何位置。制定了与正常情况和四种变异相对应的解剖示意图。所提出的认知解剖示意图简单总结了与正常情况相比可能出现的偏差。我们认为,正确应用CVS与胆囊切除手术解剖学的结构化知识之间的协同作用有助于外科医生安全处理非典型结构,并完成无血管-胆管损伤的腹腔镜或开放胆囊切除术。

相似文献

1
Anatomical Schemata Revealed by the Critical View of Safety Approach: A Proposal of the Hellenic Task Force on the Typology of Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (HETALCHO).安全入路批判性视角揭示的解剖学模式:希腊安全腹腔镜胆囊切除术类型学特别工作组(HETALCHO)的提议
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Nov 29;60(12):1968. doi: 10.3390/medicina60121968.
2
Aberrant anatomy in the context of the critical view of safety.在安全关键视野背景下的异常解剖结构。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1086-1100. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11437-y. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
3
Biliary tract injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: three case reports and literature review.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的胆道损伤:三例报告及文献综述
G Chir. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1-2):16-9.
4
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy--accessory bile ducts].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术——副胆管]
Acta Med Croatica. 2003;57(2):105-9.
5
Improving the Safety of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Indocyanine Green Dye Using Critical View of Safety Plus.应用安全关键视角加用吲哚菁绿染料提高腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性
Am Surg. 2023 Jul;89(7):3136-3139. doi: 10.1177/00031348231161659. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
6
Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FALCON trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.近红外荧光胆管造影辅助腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(FALCON试验):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 26;6(8):e011668. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011668.
7
[Identification of gallbladder pedicle anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆囊蒂解剖结构的识别]
Chir Ital. 2004 May-Jun;56(3):389-96.
8
Hepatobiliary anatomy in patients with transposition of the gallbladder: implications for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.胆囊转位患者的肝胆解剖结构:对安全实施腹腔镜胆囊切除术的意义
Br J Surg. 1996 Oct;83(10):1442-3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800831037.
9
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature.不结扎胆囊管和胆囊动脉的超声刀腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Surg Endosc. 2003 Mar;17(3):442-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9068-3. Epub 2002 Oct 29.
10
Anatomical appraisal of safe cholecystectomy: a prospective study.安全胆囊切除术的解剖评估:一项前瞻性研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2023 May;93(5):1329-1334. doi: 10.1111/ans.18387. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Anatomical Challenges in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Five Arterial Branches from a Right Hepatic Caterpillar Hump.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的解剖学挑战:来自右肝毛虫样隆起的五条动脉分支。
Am J Case Rep. 2025 May 11;26:e947240. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.947240.

本文引用的文献

1
Anatomical variations of cystic artery, cystic duct, and gall bladder and their associated intraoperative and postoperative complications: an observational study.胆囊动脉、胆囊管及胆囊的解剖变异及其相关术中及术后并发症:一项观察性研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Jul 10;85(8):3880-3886. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001079. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Challenging Orthodoxy: Beyond the Critical View of Safety.挑战正统观念:超越对安全性的批判性观点。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Sep;27(9):2034. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05785-8. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
3
Anatomical appraisal of safe cholecystectomy: a prospective study.
安全胆囊切除术的解剖评估:一项前瞻性研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2023 May;93(5):1329-1334. doi: 10.1111/ans.18387. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
4
How to achieve the critical view of safety for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Technical aspects.如何在安全的腹腔镜胆囊切除术中实现对安全性的批判性观点:技术方面。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2023 May 31;27(2):201-210. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.22-064. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
5
Cognitive Load Management: An Invaluable Tool for Safe and Effective Surgical Training.认知负荷管理:安全有效手术培训的宝贵工具。
J Surg Educ. 2023 Mar;80(3):311-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.12.010. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
6
Fat clearance in the hepatocystic triangle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Fact or fad? An NIRF-based study.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中肝胆囊三角脂肪廓清:事实还是潮流?基于 NIRF 的研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2023 Jul;16(3):368-375. doi: 10.1111/ases.13165. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
7
Challenging Orthodoxy: beyond the Critical View of Safety.挑战正统观念:超越对安全性的批判性观点。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jan;27(1):89-92. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05500-z. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
8
Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Word of Caution in Cases of Aberrant Anatomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全性的批判性观点:解剖结构异常病例中的一则警示
Surg J (N Y). 2022 Oct 18;8(3):e157-e161. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744154. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
Congenital absence of the cystic duct: Case report of a rare anomaly and review of the literature.先天性胆囊管缺如:一例罕见异常病例报告及文献复习
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Jul;96:107353. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107353. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
10
Anaotmical variability in the position of cystic artery during laparoscopic visualization.腹腔镜可视化下胆囊动脉位置的解剖学变异。
BMC Surg. 2021 May 27;21(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01270-8.