Suppr超能文献

阿卡波糖或格列本脲治疗对2型糖尿病患者胰岛素敏感性的影响。

Influence of treatment with acarbose or glibenclamide on insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patients.

作者信息

Fischer S, Patzak A, Rietzsch H, Schwanebeck U, Köhler C, Wildbrett J, Fuecker K, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T, Hanefeld M

机构信息

Institute and Outpatient Department of Clinical Metabolic Research, Medical Faculty 'Carl Gustav Carus' of the Technical University Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2003 Jan;5(1):38-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1326.2003.00239.x.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of our double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to compare the effect of acarbose and glibenclamide on the insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We investigated 77 patients (mean age 58.7 years, mean BMI 27.3 kg/m2), treated by diet alone for at least 4 weeks. The subjects were randomized into three treatment groups for 16 weeks: 100 mg t.i.d. acarbose (n = 25) or 1 mg t.i.d. glibenclamide (n = 27) or one t.i.d. placebo (n = 25). Before and after therapy, the levels of fasting plasma glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin, fasting insulin, plasma glucose and insulin 1 h after a standardized breakfast were measured and insulin sensitivity determined by euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp test.

RESULTS

After the treatment period, BMI in the acarbose and placebo group decreased significantly, whereas in the glibenclamide group a significant increase was observed. Fasting plasma glucose was only significant reduced under glibenclamide. The postprandial glucose decreased significantly after acarbose (13.8 vs. 11.4 mmol/l, p < 0.05) and glibenclamide treatment (14.6 vs. 11.4 mmol/l, p < 0.05) and was unchanged under placebo (13.8 vs. 13.7 mmol/l). The fasting insulin levels remained unchanged in all three groups, whereas postprandial insulin values increased significantly under glibenclamide. Neither acarbose nor glibenclamide significantly changed insulin sensitivity [acarbose: glucose disposal rate before treatment 2.3 mg/kg body weight/min/insulin, after treatment 3.2; glibenclamide 2.2 vs. 2.1; placebo 2.6 vs. 3.0].

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show a more substantial improvement of glucose control under glibenclamide than under acarbose which, however, was not associated with an increase of insulin sensitivity.

摘要

目的

我们这项双盲、安慰剂对照研究的目的是比较阿卡波糖和格列本脲对2型糖尿病患者胰岛素敏感性的影响。

方法

我们调查了77例患者(平均年龄58.7岁,平均体重指数27.3kg/m²),这些患者仅通过饮食治疗至少4周。将受试者随机分为三个治疗组,治疗16周:100mg每日三次阿卡波糖(n = 25)或1mg每日三次格列本脲(n = 27)或每日三次安慰剂(n = 25)。治疗前后,测量空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、空腹胰岛素、标准早餐后1小时的血糖和胰岛素水平,并通过正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹试验测定胰岛素敏感性。

结果

治疗期后,阿卡波糖组和安慰剂组的体重指数显著下降,而格列本脲组则显著增加。仅格列本脲治疗可使空腹血糖显著降低。阿卡波糖(13.8对11.4mmol/l,p < 0.05)和格列本脲治疗后(14.6对11.4mmol/l,p < 0.05)餐后血糖显著下降,安慰剂组则无变化(13.8对13.7mmol/l)。所有三组的空腹胰岛素水平均保持不变,而格列本脲治疗后餐后胰岛素值显著升高。阿卡波糖和格列本脲均未显著改变胰岛素敏感性[阿卡波糖:治疗前葡萄糖处置率2.3mg/kg体重/分钟/胰岛素,治疗后3.2;格列本脲2.2对2.1;安慰剂2.6对3.0]。

结论

我们的结果表明,格列本脲治疗下的血糖控制改善比阿卡波糖更显著,然而,这与胰岛素敏感性增加无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验