Suppr超能文献

对α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂在亚洲和非亚洲人群中的疗效和安全性进行的荟萃分析和批判性评价。

Meta-analysis and critical review on the efficacy and safety of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors in Asian and non-Asian populations.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Diabetes Investig. 2018 Mar;9(2):321-331. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12711. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

Abstract

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (AGI) in Asian and non-Asian type 2 diabetes patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies were identified through a literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases until December 2016. All statistical analyses were carried out in Review Manager statistical software by computing the weighted mean difference or odds ratio and 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

A total of 67 studies were included. AGI vs placebo: compared with the placebo, AGI treatment led to a greater decrease in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose and postprandial plasma glucose. No significant difference was observed in HbA1c change, fasting plasma glucose change, postprandial plasma glucose change or incidence of hypoglycemia between Asian and non-Asian patients. AGI vs active controls: in Asian patients, AGI treatment showed a lower reduction in HbA1c compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and sulfonylurea. In non-Asian patients, AGI treatment showed a lower reduction in HbA1c compared with thiazolidinedione. No significant difference was observed in HbA1c change and bodyweight change when comparing AGI with other oral hypoglycemic agents between Asian and non-Asian patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of AGI treatment on glycemic control and bodyweight reduction were superior to the placebo without an increased incidence of hypoglycemia, but with an increased incidence of gastrointestinal discomforts. The hypoglycemic effects of AGI were comparable between Asian and non-Asian patients.

摘要

目的/引言:评估α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂(AGI)在亚洲和非亚洲 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性。

材料和方法

通过对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和其他数据库的文献检索,确定了研究。所有统计分析均在 Review Manager 统计软件中进行,计算加权均数差或比值比及其 95%置信区间。

结果

共纳入 67 项研究。AGI 与安慰剂相比:与安慰剂相比,AGI 治疗可使糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖和餐后血糖水平显著降低。亚洲和非亚洲患者之间在 HbA1c 变化、空腹血糖变化、餐后血糖变化或低血糖发生率方面无显著差异。AGI 与活性对照相比:在亚洲患者中,AGI 治疗组与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂和磺脲类药物相比,HbA1c 降低幅度较小。在非亚洲患者中,AGI 治疗组与噻唑烷二酮类药物相比,HbA1c 降低幅度较小。在亚洲和非亚洲患者中,AGI 与其他口服降糖药相比,HbA1c 变化和体重变化方面无显著差异。

结论

AGI 治疗在改善血糖控制和减轻体重方面的效果优于安慰剂,且低血糖发生率无增加,但胃肠道不适发生率增加。AGI 的降糖效果在亚洲和非亚洲患者中相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe4/5835463/46e442a5d452/JDI-9-321-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验