Hoffmann J, Spengler M
Medical Department Germany of BAYER AG, Wuppertal, Germany.
Diabetes Care. 1994 Jun;17(6):561-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.17.6.561.
To compare the different therapeutic principles of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and sulphonylureas as first-line treatment in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients with dietary failure.
Ninety-six NIDDM patients (35-70 years of age, body mass index [BMI] < or = 35), insufficiently treated with diet alone (HbA1c 7-9%) were randomized into three groups and treated for 24 weeks with acarbose, glibenclamide, or placebo. Efficacy, based on fasting blood glucose (BG), BG 1 h after ingestion of standard breakfast (postprandial), serum insulin, postprandial insulin increase, and HbA1c; and tolerability, based on subjective symptoms and laboratory values, were investigated every 6 weeks. Efficacy evaluation was valid for 85 patients.
The test drugs were dosed as follows: 100 mg acarbose (A) three times a day, 1 placebo tablet three times a day, 3.5 mg glibenclamide tablets dosed 1-0-0 or 1-0-1, mean dose 4.3 mg/day. Compared with the placebo, both drugs showed the same mean efficacy on fasting BG (-1.4 mM with acarbose, -1.6 mM with glibenclamide), 1-h postprandial BG (-2.2 mM with acarbose, -1.9 mM with glibenclamide), and HbA1c (-1.1% with acarbose, -0.9% with glibenclamide); but they showed a marked difference in 1-h postprandial insulin values (-80.7 pM with acarbose, 96.7 pM with glibenclamide). The mean relative insulin increase (1-h postprandial) was 1.5 in the placebo group, 1.1 in the acarbose group, and 2.5 in the glibenclamide group. No changes in body weight could be observed. No adverse events were seen under placebo. Acarbose led to mild or moderate intestinal symptoms in 38% of patients. Glibenclamide led to hypoglycemia, which could be solved by dose reduction, in 6% of patients. No dropouts occurred in any of the treatment groups.
Acarbose and glibenclamide are effective drugs for the monotherapy of NIDDM patients when diet alone fails. Because postprandial insulin increase has been shown to be associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease, acarbose, which lowers pp increase, may be superior to glibenclamide, which elevates postprandial insulin increase.
比较α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂和磺脲类药物作为一线治疗药物,用于饮食治疗效果不佳的非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)患者的不同治疗原则。
96例年龄在35至70岁、体重指数(BMI)≤35、单纯饮食治疗效果不佳(糖化血红蛋白HbA1c为7%至9%)的NIDDM患者被随机分为三组,分别接受阿卡波糖、格列本脲或安慰剂治疗24周。每6周对基于空腹血糖(BG)、摄入标准早餐后1小时血糖(餐后)、血清胰岛素、餐后胰岛素增加值以及HbA1c的疗效,和基于主观症状及实验室检查值的耐受性进行研究。85例患者的疗效评估有效。
试验药物给药方案如下:阿卡波糖100毫克,每日三次;安慰剂片,每日三次;格列本脲片3.5毫克,给药方案为1 - 0 - 0或1 - 0 - 1,平均剂量4.3毫克/天。与安慰剂相比,两种药物在空腹血糖(阿卡波糖降低1.4毫摩尔,格列本脲降低1.6毫摩尔)、餐后1小时血糖(阿卡波糖降低2.2毫摩尔,格列本脲降低1.9毫摩尔)和HbA1c(阿卡波糖降低1.1%,格列本脲降低0.9%)方面显示出相同的平均疗效;但在餐后1小时胰岛素值方面存在显著差异(阿卡波糖降低80.7皮摩尔,格列本脲升高96.7皮摩尔)。安慰剂组餐后1小时平均相对胰岛素增加值为1.5,阿卡波糖组为1.1,格列本脲组为2.5。未观察到体重变化。安慰剂组未出现不良事件。阿卡波糖使38%的患者出现轻度或中度肠道症状。格列本脲使占患者总数6%的患者出现低血糖,可通过减少剂量解决。各治疗组均未出现患者退出研究的情况。
当单纯饮食治疗失败时阿卡波糖和格列本脲是NIDDM患者单药治疗的有效药物。由于餐后胰岛素升高已被证明与心血管疾病风险增加相关,降低餐后血糖升高的阿卡波糖可能优于升高餐后胰岛素升高的格列本脲。