Wagner Glenn J
RAND, Santa Monica, California, USA.
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2002 Dec;16(12):599-608. doi: 10.1089/108729102761882134.
This study reports on the prevalence and predictors of adherence as measured by self-report, medication diaries, and electronic monitoring. A sample of 180 patients receiving human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antiretroviral therapy were randomized to one of three adherence surveillance methods (electronic monitoring caps, patient medication diaries, no surveillance control group) for 4 weeks, with adherence measured by self-report at study end point; 173 (96%) participants completed the study. Most participants were male (82%), non-white (68%), and unemployed (84%); mean self-reported CD4 count was 406 cells/mm,3 and 31% reported having undetectable viral load. The three methods of adherence measurement revealed moderate (electronic monitoring: 80.6%) to high (self-report: 93.7%; diaries: 92.6%) rates of adherence. Although there were differences across adherence measures, variables that were identified as correlates of lower adherence by all three methods included living with others or having a larger household, current symptomatology, and cognitive functioning deficits. This consensus across adherence measures strengthens the validity of these identified predictors and their potential value in informing the development of adherence interventions, as well as increases the validity of the three adherence measures.
本研究报告了通过自我报告、用药日记和电子监测所测得的依从性的患病率及预测因素。180名接受人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)抗逆转录病毒治疗的患者样本被随机分配至三种依从性监测方法之一(电子监测帽、患者用药日记、无监测对照组),为期4周,并在研究终点通过自我报告测量依从性;173名(96%)参与者完成了研究。大多数参与者为男性(82%)、非白人(68%)且失业(84%);自我报告的平均CD4细胞计数为406个/立方毫米,31%的参与者报告病毒载量检测不到。三种依从性测量方法显示出中等(电子监测:80.6%)至高(自我报告:93.7%;日记:92.6%)的依从率。尽管不同依从性测量方法之间存在差异,但所有三种方法均确定为依从性较低相关因素的变量包括与他人同住或家庭规模较大、当前症状以及认知功能缺陷。不同依从性测量方法之间的这种一致性加强了这些已确定预测因素的有效性及其在为依从性干预措施制定提供信息方面的潜在价值,同时也提高了三种依从性测量方法的有效性。