Ruiz-González A, Falguera M, Nogués A, Rubio-Caballero M
Department of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain.
Am J Med. 1999 Apr;106(4):385-90. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00050-9.
Although a wide variety of recognized pathogens can cause community-acquired pneumonia, in many patients the etiology remains unknown after routine diagnostic workup. The aim of this study was to identify the causal agent in these patients by obtaining lung aspirates with transthoracic needle aspiration.
During a 15-month period, all consecutive patients with community-acquired pneumonia who were eligible for transthoracic needle aspiration were enrolled in the study. In addition to conventional microbial methods (culture of blood and sputum, serologic studies), we performed cultures and genetic and antigen tests for common respiratory pathogens in lung aspirates.
The study group consisted of 109 patients. Conventional microbial studies identified an etiology in 54 patients (50%), including Mycoplasma pneumoniae in 19 patients, Chlamydia pneumoniae in 9 patients, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in 9 patients. Among the remaining 55 patients, study of the lung aspiration provided evidence of the causal agent in 36 (65%). In 4 additional patients with a single microbial diagnosis by conventional methods, the lung sample provided evidence of an additional microorganism. The new pathogens detected by lung aspiration were S. pneumoniae in 18 patients, Haemophilus influenzae in 6 patients, Pneumocystis carinii in 4 patients, and C. pneumoniae in 3 patients; other organisms were identified in 4 patients.
In our study, S. pneumoniae was the leading cause of community-acquired pneumonia, accounting for 25% of all cases, including about one-third of the cases the cause of which could not be ascertained with routine diagnostic methods.
尽管多种已确认的病原体可引起社区获得性肺炎,但在许多患者中,经过常规诊断检查后病因仍不明确。本研究的目的是通过经胸针吸获取肺吸出物来确定这些患者的病原体。
在15个月期间,所有符合经胸针吸条件的连续性社区获得性肺炎患者均纳入本研究。除了常规微生物学方法(血液和痰液培养、血清学研究)外,我们还对肺吸出物中的常见呼吸道病原体进行了培养以及基因和抗原检测。
研究组由109例患者组成。常规微生物学研究确定了54例患者(50%)的病因,其中19例为肺炎支原体,9例为肺炎衣原体,9例为肺炎链球菌。在其余55例患者中,对肺吸出物的研究为36例(65%)提供了病原体证据。在另外4例通过常规方法单一微生物诊断的患者中,肺样本提供了另一种微生物的证据。经肺吸出物检测到的新病原体为18例肺炎链球菌、6例流感嗜血杆菌、4例卡氏肺孢子虫和3例肺炎衣原体;4例患者鉴定出其他病原体。
在我们的研究中,肺炎链球菌是社区获得性肺炎的主要病因,占所有病例的25%,包括约三分之一常规诊断方法无法确定病因的病例。