Phillips Kathryn A, Maddala Tara, Johnson F Reed
School of Pharmacy, Institute for Health Policy Studies, and Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California-San Francisco, 94143, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2002 Dec;37(6):1681-705. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.01115.
To examine preferences for HIV test methods using conjoint analysis, a method used to measure economic preferences (utilities).
Self-administered surveys at four publicly funded HIV testing locations in San Francisco, California, between November 1999 and February 2000 (n = 365, 96 percent response rate).
We defined six important attributes of HIV tests and their levels (location, price, ease of collection, timeliness/accuracy, privacy/anonymity, and counseling). A fractional factorial design was used to develop scenarios that consisted of combinations of attribute levels. Respondents were asked 11 questions about whether they would choose "Test A or B" based on these scenarios.
We used random effects probit models to estimate utilities for testing attributes. Since price was included as an attribute, we were able to estimate willingness to pay, which provides a standardized measure for use in economic evaluations. We used extensive analyses to examine the reliability and validity of the results, including analyses of: (1) preference consistency, (2) willingness to trade among attributes, and (3) consistency with theoretical predictions.
Respondents most preferred tests that were accurate/timely and private/anonymous, whereas they had relatively lower preferences for in-person counseling. Respondents were willing to pay an additional $35 for immediate, highly accurate results; however, they had a strong disutility for receiving immediate but less accurate results. By using conjoint analysis to analyze new combinations of attributes, we found that respondents would most prefer instant, highly accurate home tests, even though they are not currently available in the U.S. Respondents were willing to pay $39 for a highly accurate, instant home test.
The method of conjoint analysis enabled us to estimate utilities for specific attributes of HIV tests as well as the overall utility obtained from various HIV tests, including tests that are under consideration but not yet available. Conjoint analysis offers an approach that can be useful for measuring and understanding the value of other health care goods, services, and interventions.
使用联合分析(一种用于衡量经济偏好[效用]的方法)来研究对HIV检测方法的偏好。
1999年11月至2000年2月期间在加利福尼亚州旧金山的四个公共资助的HIV检测地点进行的自填式调查(n = 365,应答率96%)。
我们定义了HIV检测的六个重要属性及其水平(地点、价格、采集便捷性、及时性/准确性、隐私/匿名性以及咨询服务)。采用部分因子设计来制定由属性水平组合构成的情景。基于这些情景,向受访者询问了11个关于他们会选择“检测A还是检测B”的问题。
我们使用随机效应概率模型来估计检测属性的效用。由于价格被纳入为一个属性,我们能够估计支付意愿,这为经济评估提供了一种标准化的衡量方法。我们进行了广泛的分析以检验结果的可靠性和有效性,包括对以下方面的分析:(1)偏好一致性,(2)属性间的权衡意愿,以及(3)与理论预测的一致性。
受访者最偏好准确/及时且私密/匿名的检测,而对面对面咨询的偏好相对较低。受访者愿意额外支付35美元以获得即时、高度准确的结果;然而,对于获得即时但准确性稍低的结果,他们有强烈的负效用。通过使用联合分析来分析属性的新组合,我们发现受访者最偏好即时、高度准确的家庭检测,尽管此类检测目前在美国尚不可用。受访者愿意为高度准确的即时家庭检测支付39美元。
联合分析方法使我们能够估计HIV检测特定属性的效用以及从各种HIV检测(包括正在考虑但尚未可用的检测)中获得的总体效用。联合分析提供了一种可用于衡量和理解其他医疗保健商品、服务及干预措施价值的方法。