Németh János, Fekete Orsolya, Pesztenlehrer Norbert
1st Department of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Jan;29(1):85-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01500-6.
To evaluate the precision, reproducibility, and applicability of an optical method based on partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.
Ultrasound laboratory of a university eye hospital.
A prospective comparison of measurements made by the IOLMaster optical instrument (Carl Zeiss) and Ultrascan Digital 2000 contact ultrasound A-scan (Alcon) for IOL calculations was performed. Examined were 255 eyes of 134 persons (204 phakic, 47 pseudophakic, and 4 aphakic). The mean age of the patients was 67.9 years (range 7 to 94 years).
The IOLMaster measurements were successful in more than 80% of cases: in 82%, 99%, and 99% for axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and keratometry measurements, respectively. The reproducibility of the AL and ACD measurements was very high (coefficient of variation 0.13% and 2.20%, respectively). The AL and ACD values were significantly larger with the IOLMaster (P <.001) than with the Ultrascan Digital 2000. The correlation between ultrasound and optical AL measurements was high (r = 0.985; P <.001); however, there was no correlation between ACD measurements (r = 0.079; P =.397). The corneal refractive power measurements of a Javal-type keratometer and the IOLMaster were highly correlated (r = 0.955; P <.001), with a mean difference of 0.2 diopter.
The results show that measurements for IOL calculation are easy and precise with the optical method. It is a noncontact method, so no anesthesia is needed and there is no risk of infection.
评估基于部分相干干涉测量法的光学方法在人工晶状体(IOL)屈光力计算中的精度、可重复性和适用性。
一所大学眼科医院的超声实验室。
对IOLMaster光学仪器(卡尔·蔡司)和Ultrascan Digital 2000接触式超声A超(爱尔康)进行的IOL计算测量进行前瞻性比较。检查了134人(204只晶状体眼、47只人工晶状体眼和4只无晶状体眼)的255只眼睛。患者的平均年龄为67.9岁(范围7至94岁)。
IOLMaster测量在超过80%的病例中成功:眼轴长度(AL)、前房深度(ACD)和角膜曲率测量的成功率分别为82%、99%和99%。AL和ACD测量的可重复性非常高(变异系数分别为0.13%和2.20%)。IOLMaster测量的AL和ACD值显著大于Ultrascan Digital 2000测量的值(P <.001)。超声测量与光学测量的AL之间相关性很高(r = 0.985;P <.001);然而,ACD测量之间无相关性(r = 0.079;P =.397)。Javal型角膜曲率计与IOLMaster的角膜屈光力测量高度相关(r = 0.955;P <.001),平均差值为0.2屈光度。
结果表明,光学方法进行IOL计算测量简便且精确。它是一种非接触式方法,因此无需麻醉,也没有感染风险。