Suppr超能文献

用于人工晶状体屈光度计算的眼轴长度和前房深度的光学及超声测量

Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation.

作者信息

Németh János, Fekete Orsolya, Pesztenlehrer Norbert

机构信息

1st Department of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Jan;29(1):85-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01500-6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the precision, reproducibility, and applicability of an optical method based on partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.

SETTING

Ultrasound laboratory of a university eye hospital.

METHODS

A prospective comparison of measurements made by the IOLMaster optical instrument (Carl Zeiss) and Ultrascan Digital 2000 contact ultrasound A-scan (Alcon) for IOL calculations was performed. Examined were 255 eyes of 134 persons (204 phakic, 47 pseudophakic, and 4 aphakic). The mean age of the patients was 67.9 years (range 7 to 94 years).

RESULTS

The IOLMaster measurements were successful in more than 80% of cases: in 82%, 99%, and 99% for axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and keratometry measurements, respectively. The reproducibility of the AL and ACD measurements was very high (coefficient of variation 0.13% and 2.20%, respectively). The AL and ACD values were significantly larger with the IOLMaster (P <.001) than with the Ultrascan Digital 2000. The correlation between ultrasound and optical AL measurements was high (r = 0.985; P <.001); however, there was no correlation between ACD measurements (r = 0.079; P =.397). The corneal refractive power measurements of a Javal-type keratometer and the IOLMaster were highly correlated (r = 0.955; P <.001), with a mean difference of 0.2 diopter.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that measurements for IOL calculation are easy and precise with the optical method. It is a noncontact method, so no anesthesia is needed and there is no risk of infection.

摘要

目的

评估基于部分相干干涉测量法的光学方法在人工晶状体(IOL)屈光力计算中的精度、可重复性和适用性。

设置

一所大学眼科医院的超声实验室。

方法

对IOLMaster光学仪器(卡尔·蔡司)和Ultrascan Digital 2000接触式超声A超(爱尔康)进行的IOL计算测量进行前瞻性比较。检查了134人(204只晶状体眼、47只人工晶状体眼和4只无晶状体眼)的255只眼睛。患者的平均年龄为67.9岁(范围7至94岁)。

结果

IOLMaster测量在超过80%的病例中成功:眼轴长度(AL)、前房深度(ACD)和角膜曲率测量的成功率分别为82%、99%和99%。AL和ACD测量的可重复性非常高(变异系数分别为0.13%和2.20%)。IOLMaster测量的AL和ACD值显著大于Ultrascan Digital 2000测量的值(P <.001)。超声测量与光学测量的AL之间相关性很高(r = 0.985;P <.001);然而,ACD测量之间无相关性(r = 0.079;P =.397)。Javal型角膜曲率计与IOLMaster的角膜屈光力测量高度相关(r = 0.955;P <.001),平均差值为0.2屈光度。

结论

结果表明,光学方法进行IOL计算测量简便且精确。它是一种非接触式方法,因此无需麻醉,也没有感染风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验