Suppr超能文献

两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪和部分相干干涉仪的轴向长度采集速度和一致性比较。

Comparison of acquisition rate and agreement of axial length with two swept-source optical coherence tomographers and a partial coherence interferometer.

机构信息

Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep;260(9):2905-2911. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05681-y. Epub 2022 Apr 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the acquisition rate and agreement of axial length (AL) measurements with the OA-2000, Anterion, and IOLMaster 500 in cataractous patients.

METHODS

In total, 298 eyes of 191 cataractous patients were enrolled and scanned with the three devices in random order. The success rate of AL measurements per device was calculated and a chi-square test was utilized to identify the differences in acquisition rate between the three devices. Logistic regression analysis was applied to evaluate the association of different cataract types and severity with the AL measurement acquisition rate. Bland-Altman plots were mapped to appraise the agreement of AL values.

RESULTS

AL measurements were successfully achieved in 288 eyes (96.64%) with the OA-2000, in 282 eyes (94.30%) with the Anteiron, and in 246 eyes (82.55%) with the IOLMaster 500. Significant differences in the acquisition rate were found between either of the SS-OCT devices and IOLMaster 500 by chi-square analysis (P < 0.001). No significant difference was noted between OA-2000 and Anterion. Increasing severity of posterior subcapsular cataract was associated with a higher failure rate with the IOLMaster 500. Bland-Altman analysis identified good agreement between the three biometers with narrow 95% limits of agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

The OA-2000 and Anterion showed similarly higher acquisition rate of AL measurements than IOLMaster 500 in cataractous patients. Good agreement for AL values was found between the three biometers in cataractous patients.

摘要

目的

评估在白内障患者中使用 OA-2000、Anterion 和 IOLMaster 500 测量眼轴(AL)的获得率和一致性。

方法

共纳入 191 例白内障患者的 298 只眼,随机使用这三种设备进行扫描。计算每种设备的 AL 测量成功率,并使用卡方检验来识别三种设备之间的获得率差异。应用逻辑回归分析评估不同白内障类型和严重程度与 AL 测量获得率的相关性。绘制 Bland-Altman 图来评估 AL 值的一致性。

结果

使用 OA-2000 成功测量了 288 只眼(96.64%)的 AL,使用 Anterion 成功测量了 282 只眼(94.30%)的 AL,使用 IOLMaster 500 成功测量了 246 只眼(82.55%)的 AL。卡方分析显示,在获得率方面,任何一种 SS-OCT 设备与 IOLMaster 500 之间均存在显著差异(P<0.001)。OA-2000 与 Anterion 之间无显著差异。后囊下白内障的严重程度增加与 IOLMaster 500 的失败率更高相关。Bland-Altman 分析表明,这三种生物测量仪之间具有良好的一致性,95%的一致性界限较窄。

结论

在白内障患者中,OA-2000 和 Anterion 显示出与 IOLMaster 500 相比,AL 测量的获得率更高。在白内障患者中,这三种生物测量仪之间的 AL 值具有良好的一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验