• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与缬沙坦相比,替米沙坦具有持续的降压活性。

Sustained antihypertensive activity of telmisartan compared with valsartan.

作者信息

Lacourcière Yves, Krzesinski Jean-Marie, White William B, Davidai Giora, Schumacher Helmut

机构信息

Hypertension Research Unit, Centre Hospitalier l'Université de Quebec, Ste Foy, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Blood Press Monit. 2004 Aug;9(4):203-10. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200408000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00126097-200408000-00005
PMID:15311147
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early morning blood pressure (BP) surge and 24 h mean BP are linked to target-organ damage and cardiovascular events. Antihypertensive agents should sustain BP control, particularly in the last 6 h of the dosing interval or if dosing is missed. The efficacies of the long half-life telmisartan compared with shorter half-life valsartan in the last 6 h of the dosing interval following active treatment and during 24 h after a missed dose were compared.

METHODS

In two identically designed multinational, randomized, double-blind, forced-titration studies, hypertensive patients (seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP), 95-109 mm Hg, 24 h mean ambulatory DBP, > or = 85 mm Hg) received once-daily telmisartan (40- 80 mg) or valsartan (80-160 mg) for a total of 8 weeks; uptitration occurred after 2 weeks low-dose treatment. After 4 weeks high-dose treatment, patients were given either 1 days double-blind active therapy or placebo (that is, missed dose). Following a further 2 weeks active treatment, a cross-over was performed: patients who had previously received 1 days placebo received active therapy and vice versa. At baseline and after the two active or missed doses, 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring was performed. Data from the studies were pooled, as prospectively planned and analyzed using the intent-to-treat population.

RESULTS

After active therapy, last 6 h mean DBP was reduced by 7.6+/-7.9 mm Hg with telmisartan (n=447) compared with 5.8+/-7.8 mm Hg with valsartan (n=430) (P=0.0044). Last 6 h mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was reduced by 11.1 mm Hg with telmisartan compared with 9.1 mm Hg with valsartan (P=0.0066). After a missed dose, 24 h mean DBP was reduced by 7.2+/-6.5 mm Hg with telmisartan (n=437) compared with 5.5+/-6.2 mm Hg with valsartan (n=431) (P=0.0004). The reduction in 24 h mean SBP after a missed dose was 10.7 mm Hg with telmisartan and 8.7 mm Hg with valsartan (P=0.0024). Absence of treatment-by-study interaction indicated that pooling of studies was appropriate. All 24 hourly mean reductions in DBP and SBP were greater for telmisartan than valsartan. Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to its longer half-life, telmisartan offers more sustained BP control, especially at the end of the dosing period and provides sustained efficacy in poorly compliant patients in the event of a missed dose with a statistical superiority compared with valsartan.

摘要

背景

清晨血压骤升和24小时平均血压与靶器官损害及心血管事件相关。抗高血压药物应维持血压控制,尤其是在给药间隔的最后6小时或漏服药物时。比较了长效半衰期替米沙坦与短效半衰期缬沙坦在积极治疗后给药间隔的最后6小时以及漏服药物后24小时内的疗效。

方法

在两项设计相同的跨国、随机、双盲、强制滴定研究中,高血压患者(坐位舒张压(DBP)为95 - 109 mmHg,24小时动态平均DBP≥85 mmHg)每日服用一次替米沙坦(40 - 80 mg)或缬沙坦(80 - 160 mg),共8周;低剂量治疗2周后进行剂量滴定。高剂量治疗4周后,患者接受1天的双盲积极治疗或安慰剂(即漏服剂量)。再经过2周的积极治疗后,进行交叉:之前接受1天安慰剂的患者接受积极治疗,反之亦然。在基线以及两次积极治疗或漏服剂量后,进行24小时动态血压监测。如预先计划,汇总研究数据并使用意向性治疗人群进行分析。

结果

积极治疗后,替米沙坦组(n = 447)最后6小时平均DBP降低7.6±7.9 mmHg,缬沙坦组(n = 430)降低5.8±7.8 mmHg(P = 0.0044)。替米沙坦组最后6小时平均收缩压(SBP)降低11.1 mmHg,缬沙坦组降低9.1 mmHg(P = 0.0066)。漏服剂量后,替米沙坦组(n = 437)24小时平均DBP降低7.2±6.5 mmHg,缬沙坦组(n = 431)降低5.5±6.2 mmHg(P = 0.0004)。漏服剂量后,替米沙坦组24小时平均SBP降低10.7 mmHg,缬沙坦组降低8.7 mmHg(P = 0.0024)。研究间无治疗交互作用表明汇总研究是合适的。替米沙坦组DBP和SBP的所有24小时平均降低幅度均大于缬沙坦组。两种治疗耐受性均良好。

结论

由于替米沙坦半衰期更长,其能提供更持久的血压控制,尤其是在给药期结束时,并且在患者漏服药物时对依从性差的患者也能提供持续疗效,与缬沙坦相比具有统计学优势。

相似文献

1
Sustained antihypertensive activity of telmisartan compared with valsartan.与缬沙坦相比,替米沙坦具有持续的降压活性。
Blood Press Monit. 2004 Aug;9(4):203-10. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200408000-00005.
2
Effects of the angiotensin II receptor blockers telmisartan versus valsartan on the circadian variation of blood pressure: impact on the early morning period.血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂替米沙坦与缬沙坦对血压昼夜变化的影响:对清晨时段的影响。
Am J Hypertens. 2004 Apr;17(4):347-53. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.02.016.
3
A prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing telmisartan 80 mg with valsartan 80 mg in patients with mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签试验,采用动态血压监测比较替米沙坦80毫克与缬沙坦80毫克治疗轻度至中度高血压患者的疗效。
Can J Cardiol. 2000 Sep;16(9):1123-32.
4
A multicenter, 14-week study of telmisartan and ramipril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.一项使用动态血压监测对轻度至中度高血压患者进行的替米沙坦和雷米普利的多中心、为期14周的研究。
Am J Hypertens. 2006 Jan;19(1):104-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.001.
5
Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in obese hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: the SMOOTH study.替米沙坦/氢氯噻嗪与缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪治疗肥胖的2型糖尿病高血压患者的比较:SMOOTH研究
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2007 Oct 2;6:28. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-6-28.
6
Comparative effects of telmisartan and valsartan as add-on agents for hypertensive patients with morning blood pressure insufficiently controlled by amlodipine monotherapy.比较替米沙坦和缬沙坦作为氨氯地平单药治疗晨峰血压控制不佳的高血压患者的附加治疗药物的效果。
Hypertens Res. 2014 Mar;37(3):225-31. doi: 10.1038/hr.2013.141. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
7
Comparison of telmisartan vs. valsartan in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.使用动态血压监测比较替米沙坦与缬沙坦治疗轻至中度高血压的疗效
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2002 Jul-Aug;4(4 Suppl 1):26-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2002.01586.x.
8
ABPM comparison of the antihypertensive profiles of the selective angiotensin II receptor antagonists telmisartan and losartan in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.替米沙坦与氯沙坦这两种选择性血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂在轻至中度高血压患者中的降压效果的动态血压监测比较
J Hum Hypertens. 1999 Oct;13(10):657-64. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000925.
9
Telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide versus telmisartan or hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.替米沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与替米沙坦或氢氯噻嗪单药治疗轻至中度高血压患者:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组试验。
Clin Ther. 2001 Jun;23(6):833-50. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80072-2.
10
A review of telmisartan in the treatment of hypertension: blood pressure control in the early morning hours.替米沙坦治疗高血压的综述:清晨时段的血压控制
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006;2(3):195-201. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2006.2.3.195.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for nocturnal blood pressure reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂降低夜间血压的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2362880. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2362880. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of fimasartan in patients with hypertension: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.在高血压患者中,非马沙坦的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Aug;24(8):971-983. doi: 10.1111/jch.14536. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
3
Effect of a fixed-dose combination of Telmisartan/S-amlodipine on circadian blood pressure compared with Telmisartan monotherapy: TENUVA-BP study.
替米沙坦/左旋氨氯地平固定剂量复方制剂与替米沙坦单药治疗相比对昼夜血压的影响:TENUVA-BP研究
Clin Hypertens. 2022 Mar 1;28(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40885-021-00184-0.
4
Treatment with telmisartan, a long-acting angiotensin II receptor blocker, prevents migraine attacks in Japanese non-responders to lomerizine.使用替米沙坦(一种长效血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂)进行治疗,可预防对洛美利嗪无反应的日本患者的偏头痛发作。
Neurol Sci. 2017 May;38(5):827-831. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-2854-4. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
Long-Term Tolerability and Efficacy of Single-Pill Combinations of Telmisartan 40-80 mg Plus Amlodipine 5 or 10 mg in Patients Whose Blood Pressure Was Not Initially Controlled by Amlodipine 5-10 mg: Open-Label, Long-Term Follow-Ups of the TEAMSTA-5 and TEAMSTA-10 Studies.对于初始使用5-10mg氨氯地平血压未得到控制的患者,替米沙坦40-80mg联合5或10mg氨氯地平单片复方制剂的长期耐受性和疗效:TEAMSTA-5和TEAMSTA-10研究的开放标签长期随访
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2012 Feb;73(1-2):65-84. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2012.02.004.
6
Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-receptor blockers for preventing macrovascular disease in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂预防糖尿病患者大血管疾病的效果比较:基于人群的队列研究。
CMAJ. 2013 Sep 3;185(12):1035-41. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121771. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
7
Long-term safety and efficacy of telmisartan/amlodipine single pill combination in the treatment of hypertension.替米沙坦/氨氯地平单片复方制剂治疗高血压的长期安全性和有效性
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:95-104. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S40963. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
8
Effects of Telmisartan with Hydrochlorothiazide versus Valsartan with Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Hypertension.替米沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪治疗中重度高血压患者的疗效比较
Int J Hypertens. 2012;2012:976828. doi: 10.1155/2012/976828. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
9
What is a preferred angiotensin II receptor blocker-based combination therapy for blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with diabetic and non-diabetic renal impairment?对于合并糖尿病和非糖尿病肾损害的高血压患者,哪种血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂为基础的联合治疗方案更有利于血压控制?
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012 Apr 10;11:32. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-32.
10
Pilot data on telmisartan short-term effects on glucose metabolism in the olfactory tract in Alzheimer's disease.关于替米沙坦对阿尔茨海默病嗅道葡萄糖代谢短期影响的初步数据。
Brain Behav. 2011 Nov;1(2):63-9. doi: 10.1002/brb3.13.