Allotey Pascale A, Reidpath Daniel D
Key Centre for Women's Health, Department of Public Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Reprod Health Matters. 2002 Nov;10(20):38-46. doi: 10.1016/s0968-8080(02)00075-7.
The Disability Adjusted Life-Year (DALY) heralded a new age in the development of an evidence base for priority setting and resource allocation. The DALY was intended to represent sound measurement of the incidence and prevalence of conditions in a process by which burden of disease would be determined, health conditions prioritised and interventions evaluated. However, in the reification of objectivity, sight was lost of critical aspects of health and disease, namely that they are not independent of the context in which they occur. This is powerfully illustrated by many reproductive health conditions. Priority setting and resource allocation exercises need to take into account both objective measures and contextually relevant factors. Based on comparative data that highlights the effect of the development gradient on the burden of disease, this paper discusses the implications of context in the assessment of population health and priority setting, with a focus on reproductive health.
伤残调整生命年(DALY)开创了一个新时代,为确定优先事项和分配资源建立证据基础。DALY旨在通过确定疾病负担、确定健康状况的优先顺序和评估干预措施的过程,对疾病的发病率和患病率进行合理测量。然而,在追求客观性的过程中,人们忽略了健康和疾病的关键方面,即它们并非独立于其发生的背景。许多生殖健康状况有力地说明了这一点。确定优先事项和分配资源的工作需要同时考虑客观指标和与背景相关的因素。基于突出发展梯度对疾病负担影响的比较数据,本文讨论了背景在评估人群健康和确定优先事项中的意义,重点是生殖健康。