Suppr超能文献

与参与基于学校的吸烟干预措施相关的吸烟风险。

The risk of smoking in relation to engagement with a school-based smoking intervention.

作者信息

Aveyard Paul, Markham Wolfgang A, Almond Joanne, Lancashire Emma, Cheng K K

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2003 Feb;56(4):869-82. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00088-6.

Abstract

Health promotion interventions cannot work if people do not engage with them. The aim of this study was to examine whether disengagement from an adolescent smoking prevention and cessation intervention was an independent risk factor for regular smoking 1 and 2 years later. The data were taken from a cluster randomised controlled trial, in the West Midlands, UK, based on the transtheoretical or stages of change model. In this trial, 8,352 13-14-year old school pupils enrolled, and the data in this report were based on the 7,413 and 6,782 pupils present at 1 and 2 years follow-ups, respectively. The intervention group undertook three sessions using an interactive computer programme. At the end of the programme, pupils recorded their responses to it. Pupils were classed as engaged if they thought the intervention was both useful and interesting; all others were classed as disengaged. Random effects logistic regression related the number of times engaged to regular smoking at 1 and 2 years follow-up, adjusted for school absences and 11 potential confounders. The majority of pupils were engaged by the intervention. For participants using the intervention three times but not engaging once, the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for smoking at 1 and 2 years relative to the controls were 1.83 (1.41-2.39) and 1.70 (1.38-2.11). For those engaging three times, they were 0.79 (0.60-1.03) and 0.96 (0.75-1.21). There was no interaction with baseline intention to smoke, classified by stage of change, but there was a borderline significant interaction with baseline smoking status, with disengagement acting as a stronger risk factor among baseline never-smokers. We conclude that disengagement from interventions is a risk factor for smoking independently of experimentation with cigarettes. The best explanation is that disengagement from school, an established risk factor for smoking, generalises to disengagement from didactic school-based health promotion programmes.

摘要

如果人们不参与健康促进干预措施,这些措施就无法发挥作用。本研究的目的是检验在青少年吸烟预防和戒烟干预中退出是否是1年后和2年后经常吸烟的独立危险因素。数据取自英国西米德兰兹郡一项基于跨理论或行为改变阶段模型的整群随机对照试验。在该试验中,8352名13 - 14岁的在校学生参与其中,本报告中的数据分别基于1年随访时的7413名学生和2年随访时的6782名学生。干预组使用一个交互式计算机程序进行了三次课程。课程结束时,学生记录了他们对该课程的反应。如果学生认为干预既有用又有趣,则被归类为参与;其他所有学生则被归类为未参与。随机效应逻辑回归将参与次数与1年和2年随访时的经常吸烟情况相关联,并对学校缺勤情况和11个潜在混杂因素进行了调整。大多数学生参与了干预。对于使用干预三次但一次都未参与的参与者,相对于对照组,1年和2年吸烟的优势比(95%置信区间)分别为1.83(1.41 - 2.39)和1.70(1.38 - 2.11)。对于参与三次的学生,优势比分别为0.79(0.60 - 1.03)和0.96(0.75 - 1.21)。与根据行为改变阶段分类的基线吸烟意愿没有相互作用,但与基线吸烟状态存在边缘显著的相互作用,在基线从不吸烟者中,退出是一个更强的危险因素。我们得出结论,退出干预是吸烟的一个危险因素,独立于尝试吸烟。最好的解释是,退出学校(吸烟的一个既定危险因素)会推广到退出基于学校的说教式健康促进项目。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验