Vermylen Katrien, Collaert Bruno, Lindén Ulf, Björn Anna-Lisa, De Bruyn Hugo
Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Feb;14(1):119-24. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140116.x.
This retrospective study focuses on patient opinion and professionally assessed quality of single-tooth restorations of Brånemark fixtures. Patients were treated by periodontists for fixture installation and/or abutment connection and by referring general practitioners for prosthetic rehabilitation. Seventy-eight consecutively treated patients were sent a questionnaire regarding aesthetics, phonetics and overall satisfaction. Forty-eight patients (52 fixtures) returned the questionnaire. Forty were able to attend a clinical examination by an independent examiner. The quality of 43 single implant crowns was evaluated according to the modified guidelines for assessment of quality and professional performance used for evaluation of design, fit, occlusion/articulation and aesthetics. Bone to implant level was assessed radiographically. Patients were very positive about aesthetics, phonetics, eating comfort and overall satisfaction. Nevertheless, 6/40 patients would not undergo the same treatment again, yet all of them would recommend it to others. The professionally rated quality of the crowns was perfect in 17 and acceptable in 25 cases. One crown needed modification to prevent future complications. Two crowns had already been replaced as a result of porcelain fracture; one restoration showed abrasion and one was damaged. With a mean loading time of 33 months (range: 3-89 months), none of the patients returning the questionnaire had encountered fixture loss. All except five fixtures showed bone remodelling at or above the first implant thread. It is concluded that single Brånemark fixtures installed by periodontists and restored by general practitioners are of an acceptable clinical quality to satisfy the patient.
这项回顾性研究聚焦于患者对Brånemark种植体单颗牙齿修复的看法以及专业评估的修复质量。种植体植入和/或基台连接由牙周病医生进行治疗,修复由转诊的全科医生进行。向78例连续接受治疗的患者发送了关于美观、语音和总体满意度的问卷。48例患者(52颗修复体)回复了问卷。40例患者能够接受独立检查者的临床检查。根据用于评估设计、适合度、咬合/关节运动和美观的质量与专业表现评估的修订指南,对43个单颗种植体牙冠的质量进行了评估。通过影像学评估骨与种植体的水平。患者对美观、语音、进食舒适度和总体满意度非常满意。然而,6/40的患者不会再次接受相同的治疗,但他们都愿意将其推荐给他人。牙冠的专业评级质量在17例中为完美,25例中为可接受。1个牙冠需要修改以预防未来的并发症。2个牙冠因瓷裂已被替换;1个修复体出现磨损,1个受损。平均加载时间为33个月(范围:3 - 89个月),回复问卷的患者中无一例出现种植体脱落。除5个种植体外,所有种植体在第一种植体螺纹处或以上均显示骨重塑。结论为,由牙周病医生植入并由全科医生修复的单颗Brånemark种植体具有可接受的临床质量,能够满足患者需求。