Micklewright R, Lane S, Linley W, McQuade C, Thompson F, Maskrey N
National Prescribing Centre, Liverpool, UK.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Feb;17(3):321-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01454.x.
In patients at high risk of NSAID-associated serious upper gastrointestinal complications, gastroprotection with misoprostol or a proton pump inhibitor should be considered. Only misoprostol, 800 micro g/day, has been shown to reduce serious upper gastrointestinal complications in a large clinical outcome trial. The benefit of Helicobacter pylori eradication in reducing NSAID-associated gastrointestinal toxicity is controversial, and routine testing for and eradication of H. pylori in NSAID users are not currently advised. The gastrointestinal safety of rofecoxib and celecoxib has been assessed in large clinical outcome trials which, on first analysis, show benefits over non-selective NSAIDs in the incidence of serious upper gastrointestinal complications. However, longer term gastrointestinal data from the celecoxib study (CLASS) and cardiovascular adverse event data from the rofecoxib study (VIGOR) have questioned the risk-benefit profile of these new drugs and, until they are better understood, it seems sensible not to use them routinely in large numbers of individuals. The gastrointestinal safety of meloxicam and etodolac has not been adequately assessed in such trials. Therefore, evidence for their use instead of non-selective NSAIDs, or instead of celecoxib or rofecoxib, is not robust.
对于非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)相关严重上消化道并发症高危患者,应考虑使用米索前列醇或质子泵抑制剂进行胃保护。只有米索前列醇,每日800微克,在一项大型临床结局试验中显示可降低严重上消化道并发症的发生。根除幽门螺杆菌在降低NSAID相关胃肠道毒性方面的益处存在争议,目前不建议对NSAID使用者常规检测和根除幽门螺杆菌。在大型临床结局试验中对罗非昔布和塞来昔布的胃肠道安全性进行了评估,初步分析显示在严重上消化道并发症发生率方面优于非选择性NSAID。然而,塞来昔布研究(CLASS)的长期胃肠道数据和罗非昔布研究(VIGOR)的心血管不良事件数据对这些新药的风险效益比提出了质疑,在对它们有更好的了解之前,似乎明智的做法是不要在大量个体中常规使用它们。美洛昔康和依托度酸的胃肠道安全性在这类试验中尚未得到充分评估。因此,用它们替代非选择性NSAID,或替代塞来昔布或罗非昔布的证据并不充分。