Zullo Angelo, Hassan Cesare, Campo Salvatore M A, Morini Sergio
Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Drugs Aging. 2007;24(10):815-28. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200724100-00003.
Peptic ulcer bleeding is a frequent and dramatic event with both a high mortality rate and a substantial cost for healthcare systems worldwide. It has been found that age is an independent predisposing factor for gastrointestinal bleeding, with the risk increasing significantly in individuals aged>65 years and increasing further in those aged>75 years. Indeed, bleeding incidence and mortality are distinctly higher in elderly patients, especially in those with co-morbidities. NSAID therapy and Helicobacter pylori infection are the most prevalent aetiopathogenetic factors involved in peptic ulcer bleeding. The risk of bleeding seems to be higher for NSAID- than for H. pylori-related ulcers, most likely because the antiplatelet action of NSAIDs impairs the clotting process. NSAID users may be classified as low or high risk, according to the absence or presence of one or more of the following factors associated with an increased risk of bleeding: co-morbidities; corticosteroid or anticoagulant co-therapy; previous dyspepsia, peptic ulcer or ulcer bleeding; and alcohol consumption. Different types of NSAIDs have been associated with different bleeding risk, but no anti-inflammatory drug, including selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, is completely safe for the stomach. Furthermore, even low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) [<325 mg/day] and a standard dose of non-aspirin antiplatelet treatment (clopidogrel or ticlopidine) have been found to cause bleeding and mortality. No clear risk factor favouring H. pylori-related ulcer bleeding has been identified. Peptic ulcer bleeding prevention remains a challenge for the physician, but data are now available on use of a safer and cheaper strategy for both low- and high-risk patients. Unfortunately, despite the fact that several society and national guidelines have been formulated, these are poorly followed in clinical practice. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or misoprostol therapy and H. pylori eradication in NSAID-naive patients are the most commonly proposed strategies. Selective COX-2 inhibitor therapy in high-risk patients has also been suggested, but concerns over the possible cardiovascular adverse effects of some of these agents should be taken into account. Moreover, switching to selective COX-2 inhibitors in patients with previous bleeding is not completely risk free, and concomitant PPI therapy is also needed. H. pylori eradication is mandatory in all patients with peptic ulcer, and such an approach has been found to be significantly superior to PPI maintenance therapy. H. pylori eradication is frequently achieved with sequential therapy in elderly patients with peptic ulcer. In conclusion, upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a dramatic event with a high mortality rate, particularly in the elderly. Some effective preventative strategies are now available that should be implemented in clinical practice.
消化性溃疡出血是一种常见且严重的事件,在全球范围内的医疗系统中,其死亡率高且成本巨大。研究发现,年龄是胃肠道出血的独立易感因素,65岁以上个体的出血风险显著增加,75岁以上者风险进一步升高。事实上,老年患者的出血发生率和死亡率明显更高,尤其是那些患有合并症的患者。非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)治疗和幽门螺杆菌感染是消化性溃疡出血最常见的病因学因素。NSAID相关溃疡的出血风险似乎高于幽门螺杆菌相关溃疡,这很可能是因为NSAID的抗血小板作用会损害凝血过程。根据是否存在以下一种或多种与出血风险增加相关的因素,NSAID使用者可分为低风险或高风险:合并症;皮质类固醇或抗凝剂联合治疗;既往消化不良、消化性溃疡或溃疡出血;以及饮酒。不同类型的NSAID与不同的出血风险相关,但没有一种抗炎药,包括选择性环氧化酶(COX)-2抑制剂,对胃是完全安全的。此外,已发现即使是低剂量阿司匹林(乙酰水杨酸)[<325毫克/天]和标准剂量的非阿司匹林抗血小板治疗(氯吡格雷或噻氯匹定)也会导致出血和死亡。尚未确定有利于幽门螺杆菌相关溃疡出血的明确危险因素。消化性溃疡出血的预防对医生来说仍然是一项挑战,但现在已有针对低风险和高风险患者使用更安全、更便宜策略的数据。不幸的是,尽管已经制定了一些学会和国家指南,但在临床实践中这些指南的遵循情况很差。质子泵抑制剂(PPI)或米索前列醇治疗以及对未使用过NSAID的患者根除幽门螺杆菌是最常提出的策略。也有人建议对高风险患者使用选择性COX-2抑制剂治疗,但应考虑到其中一些药物可能的心血管不良反应。此外,既往有出血史的患者改用选择性COX-2抑制剂并非完全无风险,同时也需要PPI治疗。所有消化性溃疡患者都必须根除幽门螺杆菌,并且已发现这种方法明显优于PPI维持治疗。在老年消化性溃疡患者中,序贯疗法经常能成功根除幽门螺杆菌。总之,上消化道出血是一种严重事件,死亡率高,尤其是在老年人中。现在有一些有效的预防策略,应在临床实践中实施。