• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用门诊替考拉宁、住院治疗或门诊口服利奈唑胺治疗骨与关节感染的抗生素管理的成本最小化分析与审计。

Cost-minimization analysis and audit of antibiotic management of bone and joint infections with ambulatory teicoplanin, in-patient care or outpatient oral linezolid therapy.

作者信息

Nathwani Dilip, Barlow Gavin D, Ajdukiewicz Katherine, Gray Kirsteen, Morrison John, Clift Ben, France Anthony J, Davey Peter

机构信息

Infection and Immunodeficiency Unit, Ward 42, East Block, UK.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Feb;51(2):391-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg061.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dkg061
PMID:12562708
Abstract

Bone and joint infections are significant causes of morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. The cost of treatment for such infections is driven primarily by the length of hospital stay. Many of these infections will require treatment with prolonged periods of parenteral antibiotic therapy. Clinicians and healthcare managers are being attracted increasingly by administering treatment in the ambulatory setting as this offers clinical, economic and quality of life advantages from both the hospital's and patient's perspective. Our retrospective audit of managing 55 treatment episodes of bone and joint infections with teicoplanin delivered in the outpatient or home setting revealed that the mean cost of care per episode of infection was less with treatment in the ambulatory setting ( pound 1749.15) compared with the in-patient setting ( pound 11 400) or compared with the hypothetical situation of treatment with oral linezolid in the home setting ( pound 2546). Teicoplanin therapeutic drug monitoring appears to be valuable in establishing optimal serum levels, which appear to correlate with good clinical outcomes. The potential for alternative day or thrice weekly dosing with teicoplanin may offer further cost advantages whilst maintaining equivalent clinical effectiveness.

摘要

骨与关节感染是导致发病、死亡及增加医疗成本的重要原因。此类感染的治疗成本主要由住院时间长短决定。许多这类感染需要长期进行肠外抗生素治疗。从医院和患者的角度来看,门诊治疗具有临床、经济及生活质量等多方面优势,因此越来越吸引临床医生和医疗管理者。我们对在门诊或家中使用替考拉宁治疗55例骨与关节感染病例的回顾性审计发现,与住院治疗(11400英镑)相比,门诊治疗每例感染的平均护理成本更低(1749.15英镑);与假设在家中使用口服利奈唑胺治疗的情况(2546英镑)相比也是如此。替考拉宁治疗药物监测对于确定最佳血清水平似乎很有价值,而最佳血清水平似乎与良好的临床结果相关。替考拉宁隔日或每周三次给药的可能性可能会带来进一步的成本优势,同时保持同等的临床疗效。

相似文献

1
Cost-minimization analysis and audit of antibiotic management of bone and joint infections with ambulatory teicoplanin, in-patient care or outpatient oral linezolid therapy.使用门诊替考拉宁、住院治疗或门诊口服利奈唑胺治疗骨与关节感染的抗生素管理的成本最小化分析与审计。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Feb;51(2):391-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg061.
2
Hospital resource use and cost of treatment with linezolid versus teicoplanin for treatment of serious gram-positive bacterial infections among hospitalized patients from South America and Mexico: results from a multicenter trial.利奈唑胺与替考拉宁治疗南美洲和墨西哥住院患者严重革兰氏阳性菌感染的医院资源利用及治疗成本:一项多中心试验的结果
Clin Ther. 2003 Jun;25(6):1846-71. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80173-x.
3
An economic evaluation of a European cohort from a multinational trial of linezolid versus teicoplanin in serious Gram-positive bacterial infections: the importance of treatment setting in evaluating treatment effects.一项针对利奈唑胺与替考拉宁治疗严重革兰氏阳性菌感染的多中心试验中欧洲队列的经济学评估:治疗环境在评估治疗效果中的重要性
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 Apr;23(4):315-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.09.020.
4
Economic evaluation of linezolid versus teicoplanin for the treatment of infections caused by gram-positive microorganisms in Spain.利奈唑胺与替考拉宁治疗西班牙革兰氏阳性微生物感染的经济学评价
J Chemother. 2007 Aug;19(4):398-409. doi: 10.1179/joc.2007.19.4.398.
5
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of linezolid versus teicoplanin in bacteremia by Gram-positive microorganisms.利奈唑胺与替考拉宁治疗革兰氏阳性微生物所致菌血症的药物经济学评价
Pharm World Sci. 2005 Dec;27(6):459-64. doi: 10.1007/s11096-005-1638-8.
6
Pharmacoeconomics of linezolid.利奈唑胺的药物经济学
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 Apr;9(6):987-1000. doi: 10.1517/14656566.9.6.987.
7
Linezolid compared with teicoplanin for the treatment of suspected or proven Gram-positive infections.利奈唑胺与替考拉宁治疗疑似或确诊革兰氏阳性菌感染的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Feb;53(2):335-44. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh088. Epub 2004 Jan 16.
8
What is the place of teicoplanin and linezolid in the treatment of prosthetic joint infections?
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006 Dec;12(12):1241-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01560.x.
9
Impact of linezolid on economic outcomes and determinants of cost in a clinical trial evaluating patients with MRSA complicated skin and soft-tissue infections.在一项评估耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)复杂性皮肤和软组织感染患者的临床试验中,利奈唑胺对经济结果及成本决定因素的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jun;40(6):1017-23. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G728. Epub 2006 May 23.
10
Cost analysis of switching from i.v. vancomycin to p.o. linezolid for the management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species.从静脉注射万古霉素转换为口服利奈唑胺治疗耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌属的成本分析。
Clin Ther. 2003 Dec;25(12):3173-89. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)90101-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a thrice weekly administration of teicoplanin in the outpatient setting: a retrospective observational multicentre study.门诊环境下替考拉宁每周三次给药的评估:一项回顾性观察性多中心研究。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Feb 21;3(1):dlab012. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab012. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Clinical outcomes of teicoplanin use in the OPAT setting.门诊抗生素治疗中替考拉宁的临床疗效。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Mar;55(3):105888. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105888. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Cost-analysis of inpatient and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy in orthopaedics: A systematic literature review.
骨科住院和门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗的成本分析:一项系统文献综述
World J Clin Cases. 2019 Jul 26;7(14):1825-1836. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i14.1825.
4
Physical and chemical stability of ceftaroline in an elastomeric infusion device.头孢洛林在弹性输液装置中的物理和化学稳定性。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Oct;25(e2):e115-e119. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001221. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
5
Intravenous catheter-related adverse events exceed drug-related adverse events in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.静脉导管相关不良事件在外周静脉抗菌药物治疗的门诊患者中超过药物相关不良事件。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Mar 1;74(3):787-790. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky474.
6
Clinical and cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability of ommunity ntraenous ntibiotic ervice models: CIVAS systematic review.社区静脉抗生素服务模式的临床及成本效益、安全性与可接受性:CIVAS系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 20;7(4):e013560. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013560.
7
Teicoplanin-based antimicrobial therapy in Staphylococcus aureus bone and joint infection: tolerance, efficacy and experience with subcutaneous administration.基于替考拉宁的抗菌疗法治疗金黄色葡萄球菌骨与关节感染:耐受性、疗效及皮下给药经验
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):622. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1955-7.
8
Antibacterial susceptibility patterns and cross-resistance of methicillin resistant and sensitive staphyloccus aureus isolated from the hospitalized patients in shiraz, iran.伊朗设拉子住院患者分离的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和敏感金黄色葡萄球菌的抗菌药敏模式和交叉耐药性。
Braz J Microbiol. 2010 Jul;41(3):567-73. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822010000300005. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
9
National ambulatory emergency care survey: current level of adoption and considerations for the future.全国门诊急救护理调查:当前的采用水平和未来的考虑。
Clin Med (Lond). 2010 Dec;10(6):555-9. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-6-555.
10
Delayed development of linezolid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus following exposure to low levels of antimicrobial agents.金黄色葡萄球菌在接触低水平抗菌药物后对利奈唑胺耐药性的延迟发展。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Jun;52(6):1940-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01302-07. Epub 2008 Mar 31.