Brinkworth Russell S A, Türker Kemal S, Savundra Andrew W
Department of Physiology and Department of Dentistry, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
J Physiol. 2003 Feb 15;547(Pt 1):233-45. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.029579. Epub 2002 Dec 20.
The role of periodontal mechanoreceptors (PMRs) in the reflex control of the jaw muscles has thus far been mainly derived from animal studies. To date, the work that has been done on humans has been limited and confined to orthogonal stimulation of the labial surface of the tooth. The purpose of this study was to investigate the response of the masseter and digastric muscles in humans to controlled axial stimulation of the upper left central incisor, both before and during a local anaesthetic block of the PMRs. Ten neurologically normal young adult females were tested, each on two separate occasions to confirm the reproducibility of the results. It was found that the reflex response in the masseter was modulated by the rate of rise of the stimulus used and, to a lesser degree, the level of background muscle activity. There was little detectable change in the activity of the digastric muscle under the tested conditions and what was found could be attributed to cross-talk with the masseter. The reflex responses obtained were significantly different between subjects; however retesting the same subject on a different occasion yielded similar results. The results indicate that the most common response of the masseter muscle to brisk axial stimulation of the incisor is a reflex inhibition at 20 ms, followed by a late excitation at 44 ms. However, it is possible that this late excitation could be due to delayed action potentials and hence be artefactual. As the application of a local anaesthetic block removed or significantly reduced both of these responses, it was concluded that they originated from the PMRs. Unlike during orthogonal stimulation, slowly rising stimuli did not produce any excitatory reflex activity. This indicated a difference in jaw reflexes to forces applied in different directions, possibly due to the activation of different receptor types when stimulating the tooth in either the orthogonal or axial directions.
迄今为止,牙周机械感受器(PMRs)在颌骨肌肉反射控制中的作用主要来自动物研究。到目前为止,在人类身上所做的工作有限,且局限于对牙齿唇面的正交刺激。本研究的目的是调查人类咬肌和二腹肌在左上中切牙受控轴向刺激下,以及在PMRs局部麻醉阻滞前和阻滞期间的反应。对10名神经功能正常的年轻成年女性进行了测试,每人在两个不同场合进行测试以确认结果的可重复性。研究发现,咬肌的反射反应受所用刺激上升速率的调节,在较小程度上也受背景肌肉活动水平的调节。在测试条件下,二腹肌的活动几乎没有可检测到的变化,所发现的变化可归因于与咬肌的串扰。不同受试者获得的反射反应存在显著差异;然而,在不同场合对同一受试者进行重新测试会得到相似的结果。结果表明,咬肌对切牙快速轴向刺激的最常见反应是在20毫秒时出现反射抑制,随后在44毫秒时出现晚期兴奋。然而,这种晚期兴奋可能是由于动作电位延迟,因此可能是人为造成的。由于局部麻醉阻滞的应用消除或显著降低了这两种反应,得出的结论是它们起源于PMRs。与正交刺激不同,缓慢上升的刺激不会产生任何兴奋性反射活动。这表明对不同方向施加的力的颌反射存在差异,可能是由于在正交或轴向刺激牙齿时激活了不同类型的受体。