Bowie Derek, Garcia Elizabeth P, Marshall John, Traynelis Stephen F, Lange G David
Department of Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
J Physiol. 2003 Mar 1;547(Pt 2):373-85. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.033076. Epub 2003 Jan 10.
A diverse range of accessory proteins regulates the behaviour of most ligand- and voltage-gated ion channels. For glutamate receptor 6 (GluR6) kainate receptors, two unrelated proteins, concanavalin-A (Con-A) and postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD-95), bind to extra- and intracellular domains, respectively, but are reported to exert similar effects on GluR6 desensitization behaviour. We have tested the hypothesis that distinct allosteric binding sites control GluR6 receptors via a common transduction pathway. Rapid agonist application to excised patches revealed that neither Con-A nor PSD-95 affect the onset of desensitization. The rate of desensitization elicited by 10 mM L-glutamate was similar in control (taufast = 5.5 +/- 0.4 ms), Con-A-treated patches (taufast = 6.1 +/- 0.5 ms) and patches containing PSD-95 and GluR6 receptors (taufast = 4.7 +/- 0.6 ms). Likewise, the time course of recovery from GluR6 desensitization was similar in both control and Con-A conditions, whereas PSD-95 accelerated recovery almost twofold. Peak and steady-state (SS) dose-response relationships to glutamate were unchanged by lectin treatment (e.g. control, EC50(SS) = 31 +/- 28 microM vs Con-A, EC50(SS) = 45 +/- 9 microM, n = 6), suggesting that Con-A does not convert non-conducting channels with high agonist affinity into an open conformation. Instead, we demonstrate that the effects of Con-A on macroscopic responses reflect a shift in the relative contribution of different open states of the channel. In contrast, the effect of PSD-95 on recovery behaviour suggests that the association between kainate receptors and cytoskeletal proteins regulates signalling at glutamatergic synapses. Our results show that Con-A and PSD-95 regulate kainate receptors via distinct allosteric mechanisms targeting selective molecular steps in the transduction pathway.
多种辅助蛋白调节大多数配体门控和电压门控离子通道的行为。对于谷氨酸受体6(GluR6)红藻氨酸受体,两种不相关的蛋白,伴刀豆球蛋白A(Con-A)和突触后致密蛋白95(PSD-95),分别与胞外和胞内结构域结合,但据报道对GluR6脱敏行为具有相似的影响。我们检验了这样一个假设,即不同的变构结合位点通过共同的转导途径控制GluR6受体。对切除的膜片快速施加激动剂表明,Con-A和PSD-95均不影响脱敏的起始。在对照(快速脱敏时间常数τfast = 5.5±0.4毫秒)、Con-A处理的膜片(τfast = 6.1±0.5毫秒)以及含有PSD-95和GluR6受体的膜片(τfast = 4.7±0.6毫秒)中,10 mM L-谷氨酸引发的脱敏速率相似。同样,在对照和Con-A条件下,GluR6脱敏恢复的时间进程相似,而PSD-95使恢复加速了近两倍。凝集素处理后谷氨酸的峰值和稳态(SS)剂量-反应关系未改变(例如,对照,EC50(SS) = 31±28微摩尔;Con-A,EC50(SS) = 45±9微摩尔,n = 6),这表明Con-A不会将具有高激动剂亲和力的非传导性通道转变为开放构象。相反,我们证明Con-A对宏观反应的影响反映了通道不同开放状态相对贡献的变化。相比之下,PSD-95对恢复行为的影响表明,红藻氨酸受体与细胞骨架蛋白之间的关联调节了谷氨酸能突触处的信号传导。我们的结果表明,Con-A和PSD-95通过针对转导途径中选择性分子步骤的不同变构机制调节红藻氨酸受体。