Lipp Ottmar V, Hardwick Sascha A
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.
Biol Psychol. 2003 Feb;62(2):115-32. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(02)00115-1.
The present research investigated the effect of performance feedback on the modulation of the acoustic startle reflex in a Go/NoGo reaction time task. Experiment 1 (n = 120) crossed warning stimulus modality (acoustic, visual, and tactile) with the provision of feedback in a between subject design. Provision of performance feedback increased the number of errors committed and reduced reaction time, but did not affect blink modulation significantly. Attentional blink latency and magnitude modulation was larger during acoustic than during visual and larger during visual than during tactile warning stimuli. In comparison to control blinks, latency shortening was significant in all modality conditions whereas magnitude facilitation was not significant during tactile warning stimuli. Experiment 2 (n = 80) employed visual warning stimuli only and crossed the provision of feedback with task difficulty. Feedback and difficulty affected accuracy and reaction time. Whereas blink latency shortening was not affected, blink magnitude modulation was smallest in the Easy/No Feedback and the Difficult/Feedback conditions.
本研究在一个“是/否”反应时任务中,调查了绩效反馈对听觉惊跳反射调节的影响。实验1(n = 120)采用被试间设计,将警告刺激模态(听觉、视觉和触觉)与反馈的提供进行交叉。提供绩效反馈增加了所犯错误的数量并缩短了反应时间,但对眨眼调节没有显著影响。与视觉和触觉警告刺激相比,听觉警告刺激期间的注意瞬脱潜伏期和幅度调节更大,视觉警告刺激期间的注意瞬脱潜伏期和幅度调节大于触觉警告刺激期间。与对照眨眼相比,所有模态条件下的潜伏期缩短均显著,而触觉警告刺激期间的幅度促进不显著。实验2(n = 80)仅采用视觉警告刺激,并将反馈的提供与任务难度进行交叉。反馈和难度影响准确性和反应时间。虽然眨眼潜伏期缩短不受影响,但在简单/无反馈和困难/反馈条件下,眨眼幅度调节最小。