Laverman Gozewijn D, de Zeeuw Dick, Navis Gerjan
Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, 9713, The Netherlands.
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2002 Dec;3(4):205-13. doi: 10.3317/jraas.2002.042.
Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) or angiotensin II (Ang II), AT(1)-receptor blockers (ARB) is the cornerstone of renoprotective therapy. Still, the number of patients with end-stage renal disease is increasing worldwide, prompting the search for improved renoprotective strategies. In spite of proven efficacy at group level, the long-term renoprotective effect of RAAS blockade displays a marked between-patient heterogeneity, which is closely linked to between-patient differences in the intermediate parameters of blood pressure, proteinuria and renal haemodynamics. Of note, the between-patient differences by far exceed the between-regimen differences, and thus may provide a novel target for exploration and intervention. The responsiveness to RAAS blockade appears to be an individual characteristic as demonstrated by studies applying a rotation-schedule design. The type and severity of renal disease, obesity, insulin-resistance, glycaemic control, and genetic factors may all be involved in individual differences in responsiveness, as well as dietary factors, such as dietary sodium and protein intake. Several strategies, such as dietary sodium restriction and diuretic therapy, dose-titration for proteinuria, and dual RAAS blockade with ACE-I and ARB, can improve the response to therapy at a group level. However, when analysed for their effect in individuals, it appears that these measures do not allow poor responders to catch up with the good responders, i.e. in spite of their efficacy at group level, the available measures are usually not sufficient to overcome individual resistance to RAAS blockade. We conclude that between-patient differences in responsiveness to renoprotective intervention should get specific attention as a target for intervention. Unravelling of the underlying mechanisms may allow development of specific intervention. Based on the currently available data, we propose that response-based treatment schedules, with a multidrug approach titrated and adapted at individual responses rather than fixed treatment schedules, may provide a fruitful strategy for more effective renoprotection.
使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE-I)或血管紧张素II(Ang II)、AT(1)受体阻滞剂(ARB)阻断肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)是肾脏保护治疗的基石。尽管如此,全球终末期肾病患者的数量仍在增加,这促使人们寻求更好的肾脏保护策略。尽管在群体水平上已证实其疗效,但RAAS阻断的长期肾脏保护作用在患者之间存在显著异质性,这与患者之间血压、蛋白尿和肾脏血流动力学等中间参数的差异密切相关。值得注意的是,患者之间的差异远远超过治疗方案之间的差异,因此可能为探索和干预提供一个新的靶点。应用轮换方案设计的研究表明,对RAAS阻断的反应性似乎是一种个体特征。肾脏疾病的类型和严重程度、肥胖、胰岛素抵抗、血糖控制以及遗传因素,可能都与反应性的个体差异有关,饮食因素如饮食中钠和蛋白质的摄入量也有关系。几种策略,如饮食中钠限制和利尿剂治疗、蛋白尿的剂量滴定以及ACE-I和ARB双重RAAS阻断,在群体水平上可以改善治疗反应。然而,当分析它们对个体的影响时,似乎这些措施并不能使反应不佳者赶上反应良好者,即尽管它们在群体水平上有效,但现有的措施通常不足以克服个体对RAAS阻断的抵抗。我们得出结论,作为干预靶点,应特别关注患者对肾脏保护干预反应性的个体差异。揭示潜在机制可能有助于开发特异性干预措施。基于目前可用的数据,我们建议基于反应的治疗方案,采用多药方法根据个体反应进行滴定和调整,而不是固定的治疗方案,这可能是一种更有效的肾脏保护的有效策略。