Bamberg Richard, Cottle Jessica N, Williams James Christian
Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville NC 27858-4353, USA.
Clin Lab Sci. 2003 Winter;16(1):16-9.
The purpose of this study was to compare results obtained for the prothrombin time (PT) and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) using specimens drawn with and without a discard tube in healthy adults.
A specimen of blood in a 3.2% sodium citrate, 5.0 mL tube was drawn from one arm with a discard tube and from the other arm without a discard tube on 35 healthy adults. A PT and APTT were performed on each specimen using a fibrometer.
The PT and APTT tests were all performed in the student laboratory of the Clinical Laboratory Science Program at East Carolina University.
Study subjects induded technician, technologist, and phlebotomist employees of the clinical laboratory at Pitt County Memorial Hospital, and faculty and junior and senior students in the Clinical Laboratory Science Program at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina. All participants signed an informed consent prior to venipuncture.
Two coagulation specimens were drawn from each subject. Specimens in a discard (no anticoagulant) tube and then an anticoagulated tube were drawn from one arm, and a specimen in a single anticoagulant tube was drawn from the other arm. The PT and APTT were performed using standardized procedures with Pacific Hemostasis reagents and controls and a BBL FibroSystem fibrometer.
The degree of difference between PT results and between APTT results for specimens drawn with and without a discard tube.
Based on paired t-test analyses, no difference in mean PT results and no difference in mean APTT results were found between specimens drawn with a discard tube and those drawn without a discard tube at an alpha of 0.05. Paired-samples correlation coefficients were significant for both the PT and the APTT at an alpha of 0.05, showing precision between results with and without a discard tube for both coagulation tests.
Relative to sampling from a population of healthy adults, drawing a discard tube before a sodium citrate tube for coagulation testing appears to make an insignificant difference. Replication of these results with patients receiving anticoagulant therapy and/or patients with abnormal coagulation results, would offer cost savings by justifying elimination of discard tubes for blood draws for coagulation testing only. Such a change in protocol would also reduce the likelihood of nosocomial blood loss in vulnerable patient populations.
本研究旨在比较在健康成年人中使用带和不带弃血试管采集的标本所获得的凝血酶原时间(PT)和活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)的结果。
从35名健康成年人的一只手臂使用弃血试管采集,从另一只手臂不使用弃血试管采集3.2%柠檬酸钠5.0 mL试管中的血液标本。使用纤维蛋白仪对每个标本进行PT和APTT检测。
PT和APTT检测均在东卡罗来纳大学临床检验科学项目的学生实验室进行。
研究对象包括皮特县纪念医院临床实验室的技术员、技术专家和采血员,以及北卡罗来纳州格林维尔市东卡罗来纳大学临床检验科学项目的教师、 junior和senior学生。所有参与者在静脉穿刺前签署了知情同意书。
从每个受试者采集两份凝血标本。从一只手臂先采集弃血(无抗凝剂)试管中的标本,然后采集抗凝试管中的标本,从另一只手臂采集单个抗凝试管中的标本。使用太平洋止血试剂和对照以及BBL纤维系统纤维蛋白仪,按照标准化程序进行PT和APTT检测。
带和不带弃血试管采集的标本之间PT结果以及APTT结果的差异程度。
基于配对t检验分析,在α为0.05时,使用弃血试管采集的标本与不使用弃血试管采集的标本之间,平均PT结果无差异,平均APTT结果也无差异。在α为0.05时,PT和APTT的配对样本相关系数均显著,表明两种凝血试验带和不带弃血试管的结果之间具有精确性。
相对于从健康成年人群体中采样,在采集柠檬酸钠试管用于凝血检测之前先采集弃血试管,似乎差异不显著。在接受抗凝治疗的患者和/或凝血结果异常的患者中重复这些结果,通过证明仅在凝血检测采血时无需弃血试管,可节省成本。这种方案的改变也将降低脆弱患者群体发生医院内失血的可能性。