Dusek Tina, Bates Tamara
Zagreb University School of Medicine, Dugi dol 60/c, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Croat Med J. 2003 Feb;44(1):26-31.
To compare the teaching programs of European medical schools with the minimum requirement medical curriculum recommended by the European University Association. Methods. Information on the curricula was gathered from the websites of 32 medical schools from 18 European countries. The data collected were the number of courses and proportion of each course in the study plan according to the class hours or credits. Each curriculum was compared with the standard medical curriculum recommended by the European University Association. Courses were clustered in 3 large groups: preclinical, clinical, and public health.
The proportion of preclinical subjects was the highest at the Medical Schools in Brussels, Dublin, Milan, and Madrid, and the lowest in Athens, London, Lund, and Bucharest. The proportion of clinical subjects was the highest at the Medical Schools in London, Bucharest, and Genoa, and the lowest in Brussels, Dublin, and Milan. Croatian Medical Schools (Zagreb, Osijek, Split, and Rijeka) and the Medical School in Milan had the highest proportion of public health and humanistic subjects in their curricula. Neuroscience was found in less than half of the analyzed medical school curricula, and Psychology in about two-thirds. Nuclear Medicine course was found only in 7 out of 28 schools. Intensive Care, Anesthesiology, and Urology courses were found in less than half of the curricula. Two-thirds of analyzed curricula offered Primary Care course within the group of public health and humanistic courses. Epidemiology and Social Medicine courses were taught at more than half, and Anthropology at one-sixth of the medical schools.
The lack of uniform curriculum in European medical schools makes mutual accreditation and mobility of students very difficult. Great deviations from the standard, ie, medical curriculum recommended by the European University Association, question the possibility of a quick medical curricula reform.
比较欧洲医学院校的教学计划与欧洲大学协会推荐的最低要求医学课程。方法。从18个欧洲国家的32所医学院校网站收集课程信息。收集的数据包括课程数量以及根据学时或学分计算的每门课程在学习计划中的比例。将每个课程与欧洲大学协会推荐的标准医学课程进行比较。课程分为三大类:基础医学、临床医学和公共卫生。
基础医学课程比例在布鲁塞尔、都柏林、米兰和马德里的医学院最高,在雅典、伦敦、隆德和布加勒斯特最低。临床课程比例在伦敦、布加勒斯特和热那亚的医学院最高,在布鲁塞尔、都柏林和米兰最低。克罗地亚医学院(萨格勒布、奥西耶克、斯普利特和里耶卡)和米兰医学院的课程中公共卫生和人文课程比例最高。在不到一半的分析医学院课程中发现有神经科学课程,约三分之二的课程中有心理学课程。核医学课程仅在28所学校中的7所开设。重症监护、麻醉学和泌尿学课程在不到一半的课程中出现。三分之二的分析课程在公共卫生和人文课程组中开设了初级保健课程。超过一半的医学院教授流行病学和社会医学课程,六分之一的医学院教授人类学课程。
欧洲医学院校缺乏统一的课程设置使得学生的相互认证和流动非常困难。与欧洲大学协会推荐的标准医学课程存在很大偏差,这对快速进行医学课程改革的可能性提出了质疑。