Delacourt C, Dutau G, Lefrançois G, Clerson P
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Service de Pédiatrie, Créteil, France.
Respir Med. 2003 Feb;97 Suppl B:S27-33.
Inhaled steroids are recommended for long-term control of asthma, but their use may be limited in young children because of difficulties in using the associated inhaler device. The use of nebulizers may help to overcome this issue, without compromising therapeutic efficacy or safety. This 14-week, multicentre, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and safety of nebulized corticosteroids in paediatric patients (aged 6 months to 6 years) with severe persistent asthma. Beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) 800 microgday(-1) suspension for nebulization and budesonide (BUD) 750 microg day(-1) given by nebulization in a twice-daily regimen, and when used in addition to the usual maintenance therapy, resulted in comparable clinical efficacy across all parameters. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of patients who did not experience any major exacerbation, this being 40.4% and 51.7% in the BDP and BUD groups respectively in the ITT population (P = 0.28), and the mean number of global exacerbations (major plus minor) decreased respectively by -37.5% in the BDP group and -23.3% in the BUD group. Both treatments were also associated with marked reductions in the number of nights with wheezing and the number of days of oral steroid use. Moreover, the two treatment groups had a similar adverse-event incidence and profile. Only 11 adverse events were reported, and no serious adverse events were related to treatment. Urinary cortisol and the time course of height and weight were unaffected by both treatments, and BDP was confirmed to have a neutral effect on bone metabolism. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that both BDP 800 microg day(-1) suspension for nebulization and BUD 750 microgday(-1) administered by nebulization are effective, with an acceptable safety profile, for treatment of severe persistent asthma in infants and young children.
吸入性糖皮质激素被推荐用于哮喘的长期控制,但由于相关吸入装置使用困难,其在幼儿中的应用可能受到限制。使用雾化器可能有助于克服这一问题,且不影响治疗效果或安全性。这项为期14周的多中心、随机、对照、开放标签、平行组研究比较了雾化糖皮质激素在重度持续性哮喘儿科患者(6个月至6岁)中的疗效和安全性。丙酸倍氯米松(BDP)800微克/天(-1)雾化混悬液和布地奈德(BUD)750微克/天,采用每日两次雾化给药方案,且在常规维持治疗基础上使用时,所有参数的临床疗效相当。主要疗效终点是未发生任何严重加重的患者数量,在意向性分析人群中,BDP组和BUD组分别为40.4%和51.7%(P = 0.28),总体加重次数(严重加轻度)的平均值在BDP组降低了-37.5%,在BUD组降低了-23.3%。两种治疗方法还都与喘息发作夜数和口服糖皮质激素使用天数的显著减少有关。此外,两个治疗组的不良事件发生率和类型相似。仅报告了11例不良事件,且无严重不良事件与治疗相关。两种治疗均未影响尿皮质醇以及身高和体重的时间进程,并且证实BDP对骨代谢具有中性作用。总之,本研究表明,BDP 800微克/天(-1)雾化混悬液和BUD 750微克/天雾化给药治疗婴幼儿重度持续性哮喘均有效,且安全性可接受。