Sériès Frédéric, Ethier Germain
Centre de Recherche, Hôpital Laval, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de l'Université Laval, Québec, Canada G1V 4G5.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Jun;94(6):2289-95. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00924.2002. Epub 2003 Feb 21.
Phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) applied at end-expiration allows the investigation of passive upper airway (UA) dynamic during wakefulness. Assuming that phasic UA dilating/stabilizing forces should modify the UA properties when twitches are applied during inspiration, we compared the UA dynamic responses to expiratory and inspiratory twitches (2 s and 200 ms after expiratory and inspiratory onset, respectively) in nine men (mean age 28 yr). This procedure was repeated with a 2-cm mouth opening provided with a closed mouthpiece. The percentage of flow-limited (FL) twitches was significantly higher when PNS was realized during expiration than during inspiration. Maximal inspiratory flow (Vi(max)) of FL twitches was significantly higher for inspiratory twitches (1,383 +/- 42 and 1,185 +/- 40 ml/s). With mouth aperture, Vi(max) decreased with an increase in the corresponding pharyngeal resistance values, and the percentage of twitch with a FL regimen increased but only for inspiratory twitches. We conclude that 1) UA dynamics are significantly influenced by the inspiratory/expiratory timing at which PNS is applied, 2) the improvement in UA dynamic properties observed from expiratory to inspiratory PNS characterizes the overall inspiratory stabilizing effects, and 3) mouth aperture alters the stability of UA structures during inspiration.
在呼气末施加膈神经刺激(PNS)可用于研究清醒状态下上气道(UA)的被动动力学。假设在吸气时施加抽搐刺激时,阶段性UA扩张/稳定力会改变UA特性,我们比较了9名男性(平均年龄28岁)对上气道对呼气和吸气抽搐刺激(分别在呼气和吸气开始后2秒和200毫秒)的动力学反应。在口腔开口2厘米并配有闭口咬嘴的情况下重复此过程。当在呼气期间进行PNS时,流量受限(FL)抽搐的百分比显著高于吸气期间。FL抽搐的最大吸气流量(Vi(max))在吸气抽搐时显著更高(分别为1383±42和1185±40毫升/秒)。随着口腔开口增大,Vi(max)随着相应咽部阻力值的增加而降低,并且FL模式抽搐的百分比增加,但仅在吸气抽搐时如此。我们得出结论:1)PNS施加的吸气/呼气时机对上气道动力学有显著影响;2)从呼气PNS到吸气PNS观察到的上气道动力学特性改善体现了整体吸气稳定作用;3)口腔开口在吸气期间会改变上气道结构的稳定性。