Granot Michal, Sprecher Elliot, Yarnitsky David
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Welfare Studies, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Eur J Pain. 2003;7(2):139-43. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(02)00087-3.
The increased use of quantitative sensory testing in the study of pain raises the need to characterize various aspects of psychophysical response to noxious stimulation in healthy subjects. The present study aims to address several issues regarding the use of heat pain stimuli: (a) Are pain scores for short-term repeated phasic stimuli consistent? (b) Does an exposure to tonic heat pain stimulus cause sensitization and change the scores for subsequent phasic stimuli? and (c) Are pain scores for phasic and tonic heat pain correlated? To address these questions, a series of four phasic heat pain stimuli of 47 degrees C were given to the forearms of 70 healthy volunteers, over the course of an hour. Pain scores by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were obtained for each stimulus. In 50 subjects, a tonic heat pain of 70s duration at 47.5 degrees C was given between the first and second phasic stimuli. Pain scores were obtained at four points along this tonic stimulus. Repeated measures ANOVA and a sensitive post hoc analysis indicated that, while the pain perception was reduced on the second, nearly immediate trial, subsequent VAS scores of pain perception were not different from the first (#1: 35.2+/-19.2; #2: 31.4+/-20.2, #3: 33.0+/-21.6; and #4: 33.2+/-20.1, respectively), with strong correlation among the phasic tests. The average tonic pain score was 53.7+/-23.1. Administration of tonic pain stimuli did not result in different VAS scores of subsequent phasic pain stimuli, compared to those subjects who did not receive tonic pain stimuli. Tonic and phasic pain were positively correlated (e.g., r=0.45,p<0.001 for the first phasic stimuli). However, no relation was found between the level of perceived pain, either for phasic or for tonic stimuli, and presence or absence of temporal summation during the tonic pain.
(i) phasic pain scores assessments at 30' and 60' after baseline is consistent; (ii) tonic heat pain, despite relatively high VAS scores, does not cause a change in the scoring of subsequent phasic stimuli; and (iii) phasic and tonic pain scores correlate with each other. Thus, the normal pattern of pain perception is stable and not altered by single tonic pain stimulation.
在疼痛研究中,定量感觉测试的使用日益增加,这就需要对健康受试者对伤害性刺激的心理物理反应的各个方面进行特征描述。本研究旨在解决与热痛刺激使用相关的几个问题:(a)短期重复的相位刺激的疼痛评分是否一致?(b)暴露于持续性热痛刺激是否会导致敏化并改变后续相位刺激的评分?以及(c)相位热痛和持续性热痛的疼痛评分是否相关?为了解决这些问题,在一小时内,对70名健康志愿者的前臂施加了一系列四个47摄氏度的相位热痛刺激。对每个刺激通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)获得疼痛评分。在50名受试者中,在第一个和第二个相位刺激之间施加了持续70秒、温度为47.5摄氏度的持续性热痛。在这个持续性刺激的四个时间点获得疼痛评分。重复测量方差分析和敏感的事后分析表明,虽然在第二次几乎立即进行的试验中疼痛感知有所降低,但随后的疼痛感知VAS评分与第一次没有差异(分别为:#1:35.2±19.2;#2:31.4±20.2;#3:33.0±21.6;#4:33.2±20.1),相位测试之间具有很强的相关性。持续性疼痛的平均评分为53.7±23.1。与未接受持续性疼痛刺激的受试者相比,给予持续性疼痛刺激并未导致后续相位疼痛刺激的VAS评分出现差异。持续性疼痛和相位疼痛呈正相关(例如,第一个相位刺激时r = 0.45,p < 0.001)。然而,无论是相位刺激还是持续性刺激,所感知的疼痛程度与持续性疼痛期间是否存在时间总和之间均未发现关联。
(i)基线后30分钟和60分钟时的相位疼痛评分评估是一致的;(ii)持续性热痛,尽管VAS评分相对较高,但不会导致后续相位刺激评分的改变;(iii)相位疼痛评分和持续性疼痛评分相互关联。因此,正常的疼痛感知模式是稳定的,不会因单次持续性疼痛刺激而改变。