Staud Roland, Weyl Elizabeth E, Riley Joseph L, Fillingim Roger B
Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Department of Community Dentistry & Behavioral Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 18;9(2):e89086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089086. eCollection 2014.
In healthy individuals slow temporal summation of pain or wind-up (WU) can be evoked by repetitive heat-pulses at frequencies of ≥.33 Hz. Previous WU studies have used various stimulus frequencies and intensities to characterize central sensitization of human subjects including fibromyalgia (FM) patients. However, many trials demonstrated considerable WU-variability including zero WU or even wind-down (WD) at stimulus intensities sufficient for activating C-nociceptors. Additionally, few WU-protocols have controlled for contributions of individual pain sensitivity to WU-magnitude, which is critical for WU-comparisons. We hypothesized that integration of 3 different WU-trains into a single WU-response function (WU-RF) would not only control for individuals' pain sensitivity but also better characterize their central pain responding including WU and WD.
33 normal controls (NC) and 38 FM patients participated in a study of heat-WU. We systematically varied stimulus intensities of.4 Hz heat-pulse trains applied to the hands. Pain summation was calculated as difference scores of 1st and 5th heat-pulse ratings. WU-difference (WU-Δ) scores related to 3 heat-pulse trains (44°C, 46°C, 48°C) were integrated into WU-response functions whose slopes were used to assess group differences in central pain sensitivity. WU-aftersensations (WU-AS) at 15 s and 30 s were used to predict clinical FM pain intensity.
WU-Δ scores linearly accelerated with increasing stimulus intensity (p<.001) in both groups of subjects (FM>NC) from WD to WU. Slope of WU-RF, which is representative of central pain sensitivity, was significantly steeper in FM patients than NC (p<.003). WU-AS predicted clinical FM pain intensity (Pearson's r = .4; p<.04).
Compared to single WU series, WU-RFs integrate individuals' pain sensitivity as well as WU and WD. Slope of WU-RFs was significantly different between FM patients and NC. Therefore WU-RF may be useful for assessing central sensitization of chronic pain patients in research and clinical practice.
在健康个体中,通过频率≥0.33Hz的重复热脉冲可诱发疼痛的缓慢时间总和或wind-up(WU)。先前关于WU的研究使用了各种刺激频率和强度来表征包括纤维肌痛(FM)患者在内的人类受试者的中枢敏化。然而,许多试验表明WU存在相当大的变异性,包括在足以激活C类伤害感受器的刺激强度下出现零WU甚至wind-down(WD)。此外,很少有WU方案控制个体疼痛敏感性对WU幅度的影响,而这对于WU比较至关重要。我们假设将3种不同的WU序列整合到单个WU反应函数(WU-RF)中,不仅可以控制个体的疼痛敏感性,还能更好地表征他们包括WU和WD在内的中枢性疼痛反应。
33名正常对照(NC)和38名FM患者参与了一项热WU研究。我们系统地改变了施加于手部的0.4Hz热脉冲序列的刺激强度。疼痛总和计算为第一个和第五个热脉冲评级的差异分数。与3个热脉冲序列(44°C、46°C、48°C)相关的WU差异(WU-Δ)分数被整合到WU反应函数中,其斜率用于评估中枢性疼痛敏感性的组间差异。在15秒和30秒时的WU后感觉(WU-AS)用于预测临床FM疼痛强度。
在两组受试者(FM>NC)中,随着刺激强度从WD增加到WU,WU-Δ分数呈线性加速(p<0.001)。代表中枢性疼痛敏感性的WU-RF斜率在FM患者中比NC组显著更陡(p<0.003)。WU-AS预测了临床FM疼痛强度(Pearson相关系数r = 0.4;p<0.04)。
与单个WU序列相比,WU-RF整合了个体的疼痛敏感性以及WU和WD。FM患者和NC组之间WU-RF的斜率有显著差异。因此,WU-RF可能有助于在研究和临床实践中评估慢性疼痛患者的中枢敏化。