• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Primary options for acute care: general practitioners using their skills to manage "avoidable admission" patients in the community.

作者信息

Aish Harley, Didsbury Peter, Cressey Paul, Grigor Janice, Gribben Barry

机构信息

Primary Options for Acute Care, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2003 Feb 21;116(1169):U326.

PMID:12601403
Abstract

AIM

To enroll 600 primary care "avoidable admission" patients in a programme that utilised general practitioners to manage those patients in the community.

METHODS

The Primary Options for Acute Care (POAC) programme ran from 26 February to 31 December 2001. Using networks already established, primary care teams were invited to manage patients using any resources they required, up to a cost of approximately $266 per patient. If needed, a Service Coordinator was available to arrange investigations, care, or treatment.

RESULTS

From 26 February to 31 December 2001, 707 patients were enrolled in POAC by 100 GPs. 104 patients (15%) were eventually admitted to hospital. An average of $200.73 per patient per episode was spent (not including administrative costs). A wide variety of patients and diseases were managed. Patients and general practitioners reported high levels of satisfaction with the programme.

CONCLUSION

POAC demonstrated the ability and willingness of primary care providers to successfully manage patients who traditionally would be sent to hospital, within a defined budget

摘要

相似文献

1
Primary options for acute care: general practitioners using their skills to manage "avoidable admission" patients in the community.
N Z Med J. 2003 Feb 21;116(1169):U326.
2
Consultations in general practice and at an Aboriginal community controlled health service: do they differ?在全科医疗和原住民社区控制的健康服务机构中的会诊:它们有差异吗?
Rural Remote Health. 2006 Jul-Sep;6(3):560. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
3
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
4
Evaluation of an independent, radiographer-led community diagnostic ultrasound service provided to general practitioners.对由放射技师主导、向全科医生提供的独立社区诊断超声服务的评估。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2005 Jun;27(2):176-81. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdi006. Epub 2005 Mar 4.
5
Integrating primary and secondary care: the case of Christchurch South Health Centre.整合初级医疗与二级医疗:克赖斯特彻奇南部健康中心的案例
N Z Med J. 2000 Dec 8;113(1123):514-7.
6
Practitioners, patients, and their visits: a description of accident and medical (A&M) clinics in New Zealand, 2001/2.从业者、患者及其就诊情况:2001/2年度新西兰事故与医疗(A&M)诊所情况描述
N Z Med J. 2007 May 18;120(1254):U2538.
7
General practitioners' diagnostic skills and referral practices in managing patients with drug and alcohol-related health problems: implications for medical training and education programmes.全科医生在管理药物和酒精相关健康问题患者时的诊断技能及转诊实践:对医学培训和教育项目的启示
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2003 Dec;22(4):417-24. doi: 10.1080/09595230310001613930.
8
Utilization and costs for children who have special health care needs and are enrolled in a hospital-based comprehensive primary care clinic.有特殊医疗需求且在医院综合初级保健诊所登记的儿童的医疗服务利用情况及费用
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):e637-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2084.
9
A randomised controlled trial of joint consultations with general practitioners and cardiologists in primary care.在初级医疗保健中,全科医生与心脏病专家联合会诊的随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Feb;53(487):108-12.
10
Comparison of services provided by urban commercial, community-governed and traditional primary care practices in New Zealand.新西兰城市商业、社区管理及传统初级医疗服务机构所提供服务的比较。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Oct;12(4):215-22. doi: 10.1258/135581907782101525.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to Prevent Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.干预措施以预防潜在可避免的住院治疗:混合方法系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;10:898359. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.898359. eCollection 2022.
2
Referral management centres: promising innovations or Trojan horses?转诊管理中心:是有前景的创新还是特洛伊木马?
BMJ. 2006 Apr 8;332(7545):844-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7545.844.