Hart Tessa, Millis Scott, Novack Thomas, Englander Jeffrey, Fidler-Sheppard Rebecca, Bell Kathleen R
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Feb;84(2):221-30. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50023.
To evaluate distribution of levels of caregiver supervision at 1 year after traumatic brain injury, and to determine neuropsychologic predictors of supervision level.
Prospective longitudinal design, concurrent measurement of neuropsychologic function and supervision level.
Seventeen Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems centers.
A total of 563 adults tested at 1 year postinjury; and a subgroup of 452 studied for neuropsychologic function in the absence of impairment in mobility or basic self-care, as assessed by high FIM instrument motor scores.
Not applicable.
Supervision level measured by scores on Supervision Rating Scale (SRS).
Two thirds (69%) of the sample was rated as independent of supervision. Participants without significant dysfunction on motor FIM were grouped into supervision groups differing in intensity of time commitment from caregiver (independent, moderate supervision, heavy supervision). In univariate analyses, groups differed on demographic variables (education, race, productivity prior to injury), duration of altered consciousness, and all but 1 neuropsychologic measure. A binomial regression model (complementary log-log model) revealed that supervision at 1 year was predicted by education and scores on the Trail Making Test Part B and digits backward.
Findings confirm the importance of preinjury status and measures of working memory and cognitive flexibility in predicting functional independence after TBI. The SRS appears prone to ceiling effects in persons followed prospectively after moderate to severe TBI.
评估创伤性脑损伤后1年时照料者监督水平的分布情况,并确定监督水平的神经心理学预测因素。
前瞻性纵向设计,同时测量神经心理学功能和监督水平。
17个创伤性脑损伤模型系统中心。
共有563名成年人在受伤后1年接受测试;根据FIM仪器运动高分评估,452名亚组参与者在无行动能力或基本自我照料受损的情况下接受神经心理学功能研究。
不适用。
通过监督评定量表(SRS)得分测量监督水平。
三分之二(69%)的样本被评定为无需监督。运动FIM无明显功能障碍的参与者被分为不同照料者时间投入强度的监督组(独立、中度监督、重度监督)。在单变量分析中,各组在人口统计学变量(教育程度、种族、受伤前生产力)、意识改变持续时间以及除1项外的所有神经心理学测量指标上存在差异。二项回归模型(互补对数-对数模型)显示,1年时的监督情况可由教育程度、连线测验B部分得分和倒背数字得分预测。
研究结果证实了受伤前状态以及工作记忆和认知灵活性测量指标在预测创伤性脑损伤后功能独立性方面的重要性。对于中度至重度创伤性脑损伤后进行前瞻性随访的患者,监督评定量表似乎容易出现天花板效应。