• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健的分散化:按服务收费的医疗补助计划下儿童更换医生及医疗服务利用情况

Scattering of primary care: doctor switching and utilization of health care by children on fee-for-service Medicaid.

作者信息

Joffe G P, Rodewald L E, Herbert T, Barth R, Szilagyi P G

机构信息

Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 1999 Sep;76(3):322-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02345671.

DOI:10.1007/BF02345671
PMID:12607899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3456833/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether children on fee-for-service Medicaid who switch primary care doctors use less health care and are less up to date with preventive care visits than children who do not switch primary care doctors.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using Medicaid claims data.

SETTING

51,027 children enrolled on Medicaid in Monroe County, New York.

PATIENTS

14,187 children enrolled continuously on fee-for-service Medicaid between January 1992 and December 1994.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Utilization of primary care, emergency department (ED) services, and specialty care and proportion up to date with preventive care visits according to American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines.

RESULTS

During the 2-year study period, 22% of children switched primary care doctors. Compared with children who did not switch primary care doctors, those who switched had more primary care visits (4.7 vs. 3.2 visits/year, P < .01), age-adjusted preventive care visits (1.2 vs. 1.0 visits/year), ED visits (0.72 vs. 0.47 visits/year, P < .01), and specialist visits (0.99 vs. 0.31, P < .01). On multivariate analysis, doctor switching was associated with increased odds of being up to date with preventive care visits (odds ratio [OR] = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 2.1). However, on multivariate analysis stratified by age, the association was significant only for older children (ages 11 to 14). Altogether, 68% of all children and 44% of infants less than 1 year old made the recommended number of preventive care visits during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

All groups of children received less preventive care than recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Children who switched primary care doctors had higher utilization of health care, including primary care, ED, and specialty care. Contrary to expectations, they were more likely to be up to date with preventive care visits. The heavy utilization of health services by doctor switchers indicates that this subgroup of children on Medicaid may not be at risk for poor access to health care, but additional research is needed to determine whether the quality of care is related to doctor switching.

摘要

目的

确定与未更换初级保健医生的儿童相比,参加按服务付费医疗补助计划的儿童更换初级保健医生后是否使用更少的医疗保健服务,以及预防保健就诊的及时性是否更低。

设计

使用医疗补助计划索赔数据进行回顾性队列研究。

地点

纽约门罗县51,027名参加医疗补助计划的儿童。

患者

1992年1月至1994年12月期间连续参加按服务付费医疗补助计划的14,187名儿童。

主要观察指标

根据美国儿科学会指南,初级保健、急诊科(ED)服务和专科护理的使用情况,以及预防保健就诊达标的比例。

结果

在为期2年的研究期间,22%的儿童更换了初级保健医生。与未更换初级保健医生的儿童相比,更换医生的儿童有更多的初级保健就诊次数(4.7次/年对3.2次/年,P <.01)、年龄调整后的预防保健就诊次数(1.2次/年对1.0次/年)、急诊科就诊次数(0.72次/年对0.47次/年,P <.01)和专科就诊次数(0.99次对0.31次,P <.01)。多变量分析显示,更换医生与预防保健就诊达标的几率增加相关(优势比[OR]=1.7;95%置信区间[CI]为1.3至2.1)。然而,在按年龄分层的多变量分析中,这种关联仅在年龄较大的儿童(11至14岁)中显著。在研究期间,所有儿童中有68%,1岁以下婴儿中有44%进行了推荐次数的预防保健就诊。

结论

所有儿童组接受的预防保健均少于美国儿科学会的建议。更换初级保健医生的儿童对医疗保健的利用率更高,包括初级保健、急诊科和专科护理。与预期相反,他们进行预防保健就诊达标的可能性更大。更换医生的儿童对医疗服务的高利用率表明,这一医疗补助计划儿童亚组可能不存在获得医疗保健不足的风险,但需要进一步研究以确定医疗质量是否与更换医生有关。

相似文献

1
Scattering of primary care: doctor switching and utilization of health care by children on fee-for-service Medicaid.初级保健的分散化:按服务收费的医疗补助计划下儿童更换医生及医疗服务利用情况
J Urban Health. 1999 Sep;76(3):322-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02345671.
2
Impact of a decline in Colorado Medicaid managed care enrollment on access and quality of preventive primary care services.科罗拉多医疗补助管理式医疗参保人数下降对预防性初级保健服务的可及性和质量的影响。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1474-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0923.
3
Evaluation of New York State's Child Health Plus: children who have asthma.纽约州儿童健康加护计划评估:患有哮喘的儿童。
Pediatrics. 2000 Mar;105(3 Suppl E):719-27.
4
Impact of a Medicaid primary care provider and preventive care on pediatric hospitalization.医疗补助初级保健提供者及预防保健对儿科住院治疗的影响。
Pediatrics. 1998 Mar;101(3):E1. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.3.e1.
5
Effects of Medicaid managed care on health care use: infant emergency department and ambulatory services.医疗补助管理式医疗对医疗服务利用的影响:婴儿急诊科和门诊服务
Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;108(1):103-10. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.103.
6
Relationship between pediatric primary provider visits and acute asthma ED visits.儿科初级医疗服务提供者就诊与急性哮喘急诊就诊之间的关系。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007 Nov;42(11):1041-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20694.
7
Utilization and costs for children who have special health care needs and are enrolled in a hospital-based comprehensive primary care clinic.有特殊医疗需求且在医院综合初级保健诊所登记的儿童的医疗服务利用情况及费用
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):e637-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2084.
8
Placement changes and emergency department visits in the first year of foster care.寄养照护第一年中的安置变化及急诊就诊情况
Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):e354-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2003-0594-F.
9
Urban minority children with asthma: substantial morbidity, compromised quality and access to specialists, and the importance of poverty and specialty care.患有哮喘的城市少数民族儿童:发病率高、医疗质量受影响且难以获得专科医疗服务,以及贫困和专科护理的重要性。
J Asthma. 2009 May;46(4):392-8. doi: 10.1080/02770900802712971.
10
Evaluation of New York State's Child Health Plus: access, utilization, quality of health care, and health status.纽约州儿童健康增强计划评估:医疗服务的可及性、利用率、质量及健康状况
Pediatrics. 2000 Mar;105(3 Suppl E):711-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Verifying influenza and pneumococcal immunization status of children in 2009-2010 from primary care practice records and from the North Carolina Immunization Registry.通过初级保健实践记录和北卡罗来纳州免疫登记处核查2009 - 2010年儿童的流感和肺炎球菌免疫状况。
N C Med J. 2013 May-Jun;74(3):185-91.
2
Relationship between medical well baby visits and first dental examinations for young children in Medicaid.医疗补助计划中婴幼儿医疗保健访视与幼儿首次牙科检查的关系。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Feb;103(2):347-54. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300899. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
3
Access to health services in an urban community: does source of care make a difference?城市社区获得医疗服务的情况:医疗服务来源有影响吗?
J Urban Health. 2002 Jun;79(2):186-99. doi: 10.1093/jurban/79.2.186.

本文引用的文献

1
The timing of preventive services for women and children: the effect of having a usual source of care.妇女和儿童预防服务的时机:拥有常规医疗服务来源的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1996 Dec;86(12):1748-54. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.12.1748.
2
Continuity of pediatric ambulatory care in a universally insured population.全民参保人群中儿科门诊护理的连续性。
Pediatrics. 1996 Dec;98(6 Pt 1):1028-34.
3
Medicaid managed care: the next generation?医疗补助管理式医疗:下一代模式?
Acad Med. 1994 May;69(5):317-22. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199405000-00001.
4
Adequacy of well-child care and immunizations in US infants born in 1988.1988年美国出生婴儿的健康儿童保健及免疫接种情况。
JAMA. 1994 Oct 12;272(14):1111-5.
5
Risk factors for underimmunization in poor urban infants.城市贫困婴幼儿免疫接种不足的风险因素。
JAMA. 1994 Oct 12;272(14):1105-10.
6
Medicaid managed care: can it work for children?医疗补助管理式医疗:对儿童可行吗?
Pediatrics. 1995 Apr;95(4):591-4.
7
Children's utilization of medical care.儿童对医疗服务的利用情况。
Med Care. 1980 Dec;18(12):1196-207. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198012000-00005.
8
The changing pattern of primary pediatric care: update for one community.儿科初级保健模式的变化:一个社区的最新情况。
Pediatrics. 1984 Mar;73(3):363-74.
9
Quantitative measurement of continuity of care. Measures in use and an alternative approach.连续性护理的定量测量。现行测量方法及一种替代方法。
Med Care. 1983 Sep;21(9):858-75. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198309000-00003.
10
Chronic childhood disorders: prevalence and impact.儿童慢性疾病:患病率与影响
Pediatr Clin North Am. 1984 Feb;31(1):3-18. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)34532-1.