Slotnick Henry B, Shershneva Marianna B
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison Medical School, 2715 Marshall Court, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002 Fall;22(4):197-204. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340220403.
Actions useful in reducing unacceptable variation in physicians' clinical activities have been identified through critical reviews of randomized controlled trials, and, from them, Richard Grol proposed six elements of effective change for mounting programs to improve clinical practice. The elements include consideration of the complex reality of clinical practice, attention to the designated change, analysis of the target group and setting, mixed interventions to address needs, and a plan of action. Although empirically based, the elements lack a theoretical underpinning that explains why the elements work. This article interprets the elements using theories separately advanced by Dewey, Slotnick, and Wenger to suggest ways for understanding what studies have shown.
通过对随机对照试验的批判性回顾,已确定了有助于减少医生临床活动中不可接受差异的措施,理查德·格罗尔从中提出了六项有效变革要素,用于制定改善临床实践的计划。这些要素包括考虑临床实践的复杂现实、关注指定的变革、分析目标群体和环境、采取综合干预措施以满足需求以及制定行动计划。尽管这些要素基于实证,但缺乏解释其作用原理的理论基础。本文运用杜威、斯洛特尼克和温格分别提出的理论对这些要素进行解读,以提出理解研究结果的方法。