Grimshaw Jeremy M, Eccles Martin P, Walker Anne E, Thomas Ruth E
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Center for Best Practices, Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ontario.
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002 Fall;22(4):237-43. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340220408.
Health services research consistently demonstrates a gap between research-based best clinical practice and what doctors actually do. Traditionally, the profession of medicine has behaved as if dissemination of research findings in peer-reviewed journals will eliminate this gap, even though professionals typically have less than 1 hour per week to read. This problem is complicated by the fact that physicians have not been trained generally to appraise published research, which is of variable quality in any event. Physicians interested in changing their practices also encounter organizational, peer group, and individual barriers at the same time as they face information overload and patient expectations. In a word, physicians' abilities to manage information is overwhelmed. This article both summarizes initiatives to improve physicians' information management through efforts to synthesize available evidence and describes the current evidence base of effectiveness and efficiency of dissemination and implementation strategies. We conclude that there is an imperfect evidence base to support decisions regarding strategies that are likely to be appropriate and effective under varying circumstances. Since this problem is compounded by the lack of a theoretical base for conceptualizing physician behavior change, we suggest exploring the applicability of behavioral theories to the understanding of professional behavior change. We also suggest exploring the use of theory-based process evaluations alongside randomized trials of dissemination and implementation strategies to further test theories and to explore causal mechanisms. Further research is required to explore determinants of provider behavior to better identify modifiable and non-modifiable effect modifiers, to develop methods of identifying barriers and facilitators to change, and to estimate the efficiency of dissemination and implementation strategies in the presence of different barriers and effect modifiers.
卫生服务研究一直表明,基于研究的最佳临床实践与医生的实际行为之间存在差距。传统上,医学专业的做法似乎是,在同行评审期刊上发表研究结果就能消除这一差距,尽管专业人员每周用于阅读的时间通常不到1小时。问题因以下事实而变得复杂:医生一般没有接受过评估已发表研究的培训,而且无论如何,这些研究的质量参差不齐。有兴趣改变其医疗行为的医生在面临信息过载和患者期望的同时,还会遇到组织、同行群体和个人方面的障碍。简而言之,医生管理信息的能力不堪重负。本文既总结了通过综合现有证据来改善医生信息管理的举措,也描述了传播和实施策略有效性和效率的当前证据基础。我们得出结论,在不同情况下,支持可能合适且有效的策略决策的证据基础并不完善。由于这个问题因缺乏用于概念化医生行为改变的理论基础而更加复杂,我们建议探讨行为理论对理解专业行为改变的适用性。我们还建议在传播和实施策略的随机试验中,探索使用基于理论的过程评估,以进一步检验理论并探索因果机制。需要进一步开展研究,以探索医疗服务提供者行为的决定因素,从而更好地识别可改变和不可改变的效应修饰因素,开发识别改变的障碍和促进因素的方法,并估计在存在不同障碍和效应修饰因素的情况下传播和实施策略的效率。