Suppr超能文献

使用转诊回复信进行继续医学教育:一项综述。

Use of referral reply letters for continuing medical education: a review.

作者信息

Gagliardi Anna

机构信息

Health Policy, Management and Evaluation Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002 Fall;22(4):222-9. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340220406.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Referrals between generalists and specialists are a central component of the health care system and necessitate effective communication between the involved providers. Despite the high prevalence of patient referrals and their crucial role in continuity and quality of care, the medical literature demonstrates that generalists may receive little or no information about the care their patients received and little information about the appropriateness of the referral or recommendations for follow-up care. General practitioners (GPs) prefer teaching that is directly related to their clinical work rather than traditional continuing education such as formal lectures. The purpose of this review is to assess the role of referral reply letters in the continuing education of GPs.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to November 2001 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Research and Development Resource Base developed by Continuing Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, to identify studies that examined the use of referral letters for the transfer of information from specialists to referring physicians. Data on methodology, unit of analysis, main outcome measures, and results were extracted.

RESULTS

Of 1,250 articles retrieved, 9 met the eligibility criteria. Three of these analyzed the content of referral reply letters and 6 described the results of surveys of general and specialty physicians.

DISCUSSION

Little educational content is currently included in letters from specialists to referring GPs. GPs are receptive to the use of referral replies as sources of learning.

摘要

引言

全科医生与专科医生之间的转诊是医疗保健系统的核心组成部分,需要相关医疗服务提供者之间进行有效的沟通。尽管患者转诊很普遍,且在医疗服务的连续性和质量方面发挥着关键作用,但医学文献表明,全科医生可能很少或根本得不到有关其患者所接受治疗的信息,也很少了解转诊的适宜性或后续治疗建议。全科医生更喜欢与他们临床工作直接相关的教学方式,而非传统的继续教育方式,如正规讲座。本综述的目的是评估转诊回复信在全科医生继续教育中的作用。

方法

截至2001年11月,通过使用MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆以及多伦多大学医学院继续教育系开发的研究与发展资源库进行了全面的文献检索,以确定研究转诊信用于从专科医生向转诊医生传递信息的研究。提取了有关方法、分析单位、主要结局指标和结果的数据。

结果

在检索到的1250篇文章中,9篇符合纳入标准。其中3篇分析了转诊回复信的内容,6篇描述了对全科医生和专科医生的调查结果。

讨论

目前专科医生给转诊全科医生的信中几乎没有教育内容。全科医生愿意将转诊回复作为学习的来源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验