McConnell D, Butow P N, Tattersall M H
Medical Psychology Unit, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Br J Cancer. 1999 May;80(3-4):427-37. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690374.
Referral and reply letters are common means by which doctors exchange information pertinent to patient care. Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted exploring the views of oncologists, referring surgeons and general practitioners. Twenty-seven categories of information in referral letters and 32 in reply letters after a consultation were defined. The letters to and from six medical oncologists relating to 20 consecutive new patients were copied, and their content analysed. Oncologists, surgeons and general practitioners Australia wide were surveyed using questionnaires developed on data obtained above. Only four of 27 categories of referral information appear regularly (in > 50%) in referral letters. Oncologists want most to receive information regarding the patient's medical status, the involvement of other doctors, and any special considerations. Referring surgeons and family doctors identified delay in receiving the consultant's reply letter as of greatest concern, and insufficient detail as relatively common problems. Reply letters include more information regarding patient history/background than the recipients would like. Referring surgeons and family doctors want information regarding the proposed treatment, expected outcomes, and any psychosocial concerns, yet these items are often omitted. Consultants and referring doctors need to review, and modify their letter writing practices.
转诊信和回复信是医生交流与患者护理相关信息的常见方式。我们进行了28次半结构化访谈,探讨肿瘤学家、转诊外科医生和全科医生的观点。定义了转诊信中的27类信息和会诊后回复信中的32类信息。复印了六位肿瘤内科医生与20位连续新患者相关的往来信件,并对其内容进行了分析。利用根据上述数据编制的问卷,对澳大利亚各地的肿瘤学家、外科医生和全科医生进行了调查。转诊信中27类信息中只有四类经常(超过50%)出现。肿瘤学家最希望收到有关患者医疗状况、其他医生的参与情况以及任何特殊注意事项的信息。转诊外科医生和家庭医生认为,最令人担忧的是收到会诊医生回复信的延迟,而细节不足是相对常见的问题。回复信中包含的患者病史/背景信息比收件人希望的要多。转诊外科医生和家庭医生希望了解有关拟议治疗、预期结果以及任何社会心理问题的信息,但这些内容往往被省略。会诊医生和转诊医生需要审查并改进他们的信件书写习惯。