Donaldson D, Gelskey S C, Landry R G, Matthews D C, Sandhu H S
Department of Oral Biological and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Mar;30(3):171-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00017.x.
Six Canadian dental schools investigated the ability of a thermosetting gel containing 25 mg/g prilocaine and 25 mg/g lidocaine as active agents to produce analgesia in periodontal pockets utilizing a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
The study consisted of 130 patients, each of whom received the active or placebo gel in periodontal pockets in one quadrant of the mouth for 30 s prior to periodontal debridement (scaling and root planing). Pain was measured using both a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS).
The median VAS pain score for the patients treated with the anaesthetic gel was 5 mm (range 0-85 mm) as opposed to 13 mm (range 0-79 mm) in the placebo-treated patients (P=0.015). There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients reporting no or mild pain (78% and 76% for the anaesthetic gel and placebo, respectively). No significant differences were seen in patient demographics, or mandible versus maxilla.
The VAS pain scores showed that the anaesthetic gel 5% was statistically more effective than the placebo in reducing pain during periodontal debridement.
六所加拿大牙科学院采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,调查了一种含有25毫克/克丙胺卡因和25毫克/克利多卡因作为活性剂的热固性凝胶在牙周袋中产生镇痛效果的能力。
该研究包括130名患者,每位患者在牙周清创术(洁治和根面平整)前,于口腔一个象限的牙周袋中接受活性或安慰剂凝胶30秒。使用100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)和言语评定量表(VRS)测量疼痛。
接受麻醉凝胶治疗的患者VAS疼痛评分中位数为5毫米(范围0 - 85毫米),而接受安慰剂治疗的患者为13毫米(范围0 - 79毫米)(P = 0.015)。报告无疼痛或轻度疼痛的患者百分比无显著差异(麻醉凝胶组和安慰剂组分别为78%和76%)。患者人口统计学特征、下颌与上颌之间未见显著差异。
VAS疼痛评分表明,5%麻醉凝胶在减轻牙周清创术期间的疼痛方面,在统计学上比安慰剂更有效。