Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭治疗中的多药联合治疗(或多疗法)。

Polypharmacy (or polytherapy) in the treatment of heart failure.

作者信息

Cleland J G, Baksh A, Louis A

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Hull, UK.

出版信息

Heart Fail Monit. 2000;1(1):8-13.

Abstract

There is now conclusive evidence that most patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction should be treated with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-blockers. They will also need diuretics for the control of fluid retention. There is also a powerful case for adding spironolactone to the treatment of patients with more severe symptoms. Many doctors would also use digoxin and, especially if coronary disease is present, aspirin or warfarin. Most patients also have other chronic diseases, such as diabetes, arthritis, depression and dyspepsia, and each of these may provoke the prescription of yet another agent. Many patients will receive prescriptions to treat the side-effects of their therapy. Finding a sure path through the morass of pharmacotherapy is a daunting task. Polypharmacy is having a negative impact on new drug research in an area where there are in fact remarkably few really effective treatments and the therapeutic problem is only partially solved. This paper discusses some of the issues surrounding polypharmacy in heart failure and how to resolve them, using an illustrative case history. It highlights the potential benefits of polypharmacy with effective drugs and the gross over-use of ineffective treatments in heart failure. The major problem with polypharmacy in heart failure is not the heart failure treatment itself, but the drugs for other concomitant conditions, the effectiveness of which is often not supported by an appropriate evidence base and for which alternative, less noxious management strategies often exist. Polypharmacy may be deleterious not only because of the increased potential for side-effects and drug interactions but also because taking unnecessary therapy reduces compliance with effective drugs.

摘要

目前有确凿证据表明,大多数因左心室收缩功能障碍导致心力衰竭的患者应使用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂进行治疗。他们还需要利尿剂来控制液体潴留。对于症状较为严重的患者,添加螺内酯进行治疗也有充分的理由。许多医生还会使用地高辛,尤其是在存在冠心病的情况下,会使用阿司匹林或华法林。大多数患者还患有其他慢性疾病,如糖尿病、关节炎、抑郁症和消化不良,而每种疾病都可能促使开具另一种药物。许多患者会收到用于治疗其治疗副作用的处方。在药物治疗的困境中找到一条明确的路径是一项艰巨的任务。在一个实际上真正有效的治疗方法非常少且治疗问题仅得到部分解决的领域,多重用药正在对新药研究产生负面影响。本文通过一个实例病史讨论了心力衰竭中围绕多重用药的一些问题以及如何解决这些问题。它强调了有效药物多重用药的潜在益处以及心力衰竭中无效治疗的过度使用。心力衰竭中多重用药的主要问题不是心力衰竭治疗本身,而是用于其他伴随疾病的药物,其有效性往往缺乏适当的证据支持,而且通常存在其他危害较小的管理策略。多重用药可能有害,不仅因为副作用和药物相互作用的可能性增加,还因为接受不必要的治疗会降低对有效药物的依从性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验