• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多项选择题:猜还是不猜。

Multiple choice questions: to guess or not to guess.

作者信息

McG Harden R, Brown R A, Biran L A, Ross W P, Wakeford R E

出版信息

Med Educ. 1976 Jan;10(1):27-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1976.tb00527.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1976.tb00527.x
PMID:1263885
Abstract

Multiple choice question papers in which the student has a 'don't know' option are widely used in undergraduate and postgraduate examinations in Medicine. In the present study students' performance in papers with a 'don't know' option has been compared with their performance when they are instructed to answer all the questions. By completing questions left unanswered (i.e. 'don't know' options) students were able to increase their score significantly and the rank order of the students in class is changed. Answers omitted may indicate complete ignorance or various degrees of knowledge. It is concluded that the 'don't know' option in multiple choice question papers favours the bold and test-wise student and in consequence their validity as a measure of achievement may suffer. Papers in which the student is instructed to answer all the questions are to be preferred to those in common use where there is a 'don't know' option.

摘要

在医学本科和研究生考试中,广泛使用设有“不知道”选项的多项选择题试卷。在本研究中,将学生在设有“不知道”选项试卷中的表现,与他们被要求回答所有问题时的表现进行了比较。通过完成未作答的问题(即“不知道”选项),学生能够显著提高他们的分数,并且班级中学生的排名顺序也会改变。遗漏的答案可能表明完全无知或不同程度的了解。得出的结论是,多项选择题试卷中的“不知道”选项有利于大胆且考试经验丰富的学生,因此其作为成绩衡量标准的有效性可能会受到影响。要求学生回答所有问题的试卷,比普遍使用的设有“不知道”选项的试卷更可取。

相似文献

1
Multiple choice questions: to guess or not to guess.多项选择题:猜还是不猜。
Med Educ. 1976 Jan;10(1):27-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1976.tb00527.x.
2
The effect of a 'don't know' option on test scores: number-right and formula scoring compared.“不知道”选项对考试成绩的影响:正确题数计分与公式计分的比较
Med Educ. 1999 Apr;33(4):267-75. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00292.x.
3
Multiple-choice testing in anatomy.解剖学中的多项选择题测试。
Med Educ. 1992 Jul;26(4):301-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1992.tb00173.x.
4
Evaluating and improving multiple choice papers: true-false questions in public health medicine.评估与改进多项选择题试卷:公共卫生医学中的是非题
Med Educ. 1994 Sep;28(5):400-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02551.x.
5
For multiple choice questions.对于选择题。
Med Teach. 1979;1(1):37-42. doi: 10.3109/01421597909010580.
6
A reappraisal of the use of the phi-coefficient in multiple choice examinations.对多项选择题考试中使用φ系数的重新评估。
Med Educ. 1987 Jan;21(1):46-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00513.x.
7
Multiple choice questions revisited.再谈多项选择题。
Med Teach. 2004 Mar;26(2):110-3. doi: 10.1080/0142159042000196141.
8
The 'don't know' option in MCQ examinations.
Br J Med Educ. 1973 Mar;7(1):25-9.
9
How did you guess? Or, what do multiple-choice questions measure?你是怎么猜到的?或者说,多项选择题衡量的是什么?
Med J Aust. 1976 Jun 5;1(23):884-6.
10
Answering MCQs: a study of confidence amongst medical students.回答多项选择题:一项关于医学生信心的研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 May;32(2):133-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1992.tb01925.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of the attitude towards risk/ambiguity on examination grades: cross-sectional study in a Portuguese medical school.风险/模糊态度对考试成绩的影响:葡萄牙一所医学院的横断面研究。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Sep;29(4):1309-1321. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10305-z. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
2
Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods.单项选择题评分:不同评分方法的范围审查与比较
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 May 19;9:e44084. doi: 10.2196/44084.
3
Guidelines for the construction of multiple choice questions tests.
多项选择题测试构建指南。
J Family Community Med. 2006 Sep;13(3):125-33.
4
Writing and marking examinations for paediatrics.编写和批改儿科学考试试卷。
Arch Dis Child. 1996 May;74(5):469-73. doi: 10.1136/adc.74.5.469.