Clayden G
Department of Paediatrics, St Thomas's Hospital, London.
Arch Dis Child. 1996 May;74(5):469-73. doi: 10.1136/adc.74.5.469.
Examinations are an essential element of medical education, which generates vehement debate but unfortunately a relative lack of rigorous critical analysis. There appears to be a background anxiety that research findings that might suggest an examination has been less than fair will lead to endless arguments with candidates who have failed that examination. It is a major responsibility of all those involved in examining to seek evidence of the fairness, reliability, and validity of the methods and the organisation of the tests. Computers have made analysis of results much easier. Access to shared banks of all types of questions and answer sheets should allow examiners to select the subject first and the assessment tool second but from a range of tested and continually modified questions which allow comparison of candidates' performance both in time and between institutions. The creation of examination materials and their evaluation must be considered as valuable an activity as research in academic life. There is little point in child health research if the advances in knowledge and skills that this generates cannot be shown to have been acquired eventually by present and future paediatricians.
考试是医学教育的一个基本要素,这引发了激烈的争论,但遗憾的是,相对缺乏严谨的批判性分析。似乎有一种潜在的担忧,即那些可能表明考试不够公平的研究结果会引发与考试不及格考生的无休止争论。所有参与考试的人员的一项主要责任是寻找证据,证明考试方法和组织的公平性、可靠性和有效性。计算机使结果分析变得容易得多。使用各类问题和答卷的共享库应使考官能够首先选择科目,其次选择评估工具,且要从一系列经过测试和不断修改的问题中进行选择,这些问题允许对考生在不同时间以及不同机构之间的表现进行比较。编写考试材料及其评估必须被视为学术生活中与研究同样有价值的活动。如果儿童健康研究产生的知识和技能进步最终不能被证明已被现在和未来的儿科医生掌握,那么儿童健康研究就没有什么意义。