Brunelli Alessandro, Al Refai Majed, Monteverde Marco, Borri Alessandro, Salati Michele, Sabbatini Armando, Fianchini Aroldo
Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Dec;74(6):1958-62. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03989-9.
The object of this study was to assess the efficay and maximum duration of effect of the pleural tent in reducing the incidence of air leak after upper lobectomy.
Two hundred patients who underwent upper lobectomy were prospectively randomized into two groups: 100 patients who underwent an upper lobectomy and a pleural tent procedure (group 1; tented patients) and 100 patients who underwent only an upper lobectomy and not a pleural tent procedure (group 2; untented patients). The preoperative, operative, and postoperative characteristics of both groups were compared. Then multivariate analyses were used to identify factors predictive of prolonged air leaks and their duration. The reduction of incidences of air leak in the two groups was subsequently compared during successive postoperative periods.
No differences were detected between the two groups in terms of preoperative and operative characteristics. A significant reduction occurred in group 1 patients for the mean duration of air leak in days (2.5 vs 7.2 days; p < 0001), the number of days a chest tube was required (7.0 vs 11.2 days; p < 0.0001), the length of postoperative hospital stay in days (8.2 vs 11.6 days; p < 0.0001), and the hospital stay cost per patient (4,110 dollars vs 5,805 dollars; p < 0.0001). Logistic regression analyses showed that not having undergone a pleural tent procedure was the most significant predictive factor of the occurrence and duration of prolonged air leaks. A greater reduction in the duration of air leaks was observed before postoperative day 4 in group 1, and logistic regression analysis showed that having undergone a pleural tent procedure was the most significant predictive factor of air leaks that persisted for less than 4 days.
Pleural tenting after upper lobectomy was a safe procedure that reduced the duration of air leaks and the hospital stay costs. The benefit from that procedure was achieved before postoperative day 4.
本研究的目的是评估胸膜帐篷术在降低肺上叶切除术后漏气发生率方面的疗效及最大作用持续时间。
200例行肺上叶切除术的患者被前瞻性随机分为两组:100例行肺上叶切除术并接受胸膜帐篷术的患者(第1组;有帐篷患者)和100例仅行肺上叶切除术而未接受胸膜帐篷术的患者(第2组;无帐篷患者)。比较两组患者术前、术中及术后的特征。然后采用多因素分析确定预测漏气延长及其持续时间的因素。随后比较两组在术后连续各时间段漏气发生率的降低情况。
两组患者术前及术中特征未发现差异。第1组患者的漏气平均持续天数(2.5天对7.2天;p<0.0001)、需要留置胸管的天数(7.0天对11.2天;p<0.0001)、术后住院天数(8.2天对11.6天;p<0.0001)及每位患者的住院费用(4110美元对5805美元;p<0.0001)均有显著降低。逻辑回归分析显示,未接受胸膜帐篷术是漏气延长发生及持续时间的最显著预测因素。第1组在术后第4天前观察到漏气持续时间有更大程度的缩短,逻辑回归分析显示,接受胸膜帐篷术是持续时间少于4天的漏气的最显著预测因素。
肺上叶切除术后胸膜帐篷术是一种安全的手术,可缩短漏气持续时间并降低住院费用。该手术的益处可在术后第4天前实现。