Okur E, Kir A, Halezeroglu S, Alpay A L, Atasalihi A
SSK Sureyyapasa Thoracic and Cardiovascular Diseases Teaching Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001 Nov;20(5):1012-5. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(01)00947-2.
Apical residual air space and prolonged air leak are not uncommon entities following resection of upper lobe of the lung. This study was carried out to observe the efficacy of pleural tenting in preventing these problems.
This is a prospective randomised study. Pleural tenting after upper or upper and middle lobectomies was performed in 20 patients. In another 20 patients who underwent upper lobectomy or bilobectomy, pleural tenting was not performed. Both groups were compared in respect to durations of postoperative chest tube drainage and hospital stay, amount of total pleural drainage, and the presence of need for any additional intervention for prolonged air leak.
Age, sex, pathology and pulmonary function tests of two groups were similar. Duration of chest tube drainage was shorter in whom pleural tenting was performed when compared to whom pleural tenting was not performed (4.3+/-0.16 days versus 7.40+/-0.68 days, P<0.0001). Mean hospital stay was shorter in tented group (7.60+/-0.4 days versus 9.35+/-0.6 days, P=0.024). Although the mean amount of total pleural drainage was less in tented group (667.5+/-57.7 ml versus 802.5+/-83.3 ml, P=0.1911), the difference was not statistically significant. Three (15%) patients in non-tented group needed an apical chest tube insertion in postoperative period for prolonged air leak with an apical pleural space. Asymptomatic apical residual space was observed in 3 patients in tented group. There was no morbidity in patients in tented group.
Pleural tenting following upper lobectomy or bilobectomy of the lung shortens the duration of chest tube drainage and hospital stay, and it prevents apical residual air spaces and related complications. Pleural tenting is safe and relatively simple procedure, which has no associated morbidity.
肺上叶切除术后,肺尖残余气腔和持续性漏气并不罕见。本研究旨在观察胸膜帐篷术在预防这些问题方面的疗效。
这是一项前瞻性随机研究。20例患者在肺上叶或上中叶切除术后进行了胸膜帐篷术。另外20例接受肺上叶切除术或双叶切除术的患者未进行胸膜帐篷术。比较两组患者术后胸腔闭式引流时间、住院时间、胸腔总引流量以及持续性漏气是否需要任何额外干预。
两组患者的年龄、性别、病理及肺功能检查相似。与未进行胸膜帐篷术的患者相比,进行胸膜帐篷术的患者胸腔闭式引流时间更短(4.3±0.16天对7.40±0.68天,P<0.0001)。帐篷组的平均住院时间更短(7.60±0.4天对9.35±0.6天,P=0.024)。虽然帐篷组的胸腔总引流量平均较少(667.5±57.7毫升对802.5±83.3毫升,P=0.1911),但差异无统计学意义。非帐篷组有3例(15%)患者术后因肺尖持续性漏气且存在肺尖胸膜腔而需要插入肺尖胸腔引流管。帐篷组有3例患者出现无症状的肺尖残余气腔。帐篷组患者无并发症发生。
肺上叶或双叶切除术后进行胸膜帐篷术可缩短胸腔闭式引流时间和住院时间,并可预防肺尖残余气腔及相关并发症。胸膜帐篷术是一种安全且相对简单的手术,无相关并发症。