Lieberman Philip
Department of Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912-1978, USA.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002;Suppl 35:36-62. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.10171.
The traditional theory equating the brain bases of language with Broca's and Wernicke's neocortical areas is wrong. Neural circuits linking activity in anatomically segregated populations of neurons in subcortical structures and the neocortex throughout the human brain regulate complex behaviors such as walking, talking, and comprehending the meaning of sentences. When we hear or read a word, neural structures involved in the perception or real-world associations of the word are activated as well as posterior cortical regions adjacent to Wernicke's area. Many areas of the neocortex and subcortical structures support the cortical-striatal-cortical circuits that confer complex syntactic ability, speech production, and a large vocabulary. However, many of these structures also form part of the neural circuits regulating other aspects of behavior. For example, the basal ganglia, which regulate motor control, are also crucial elements in the circuits that confer human linguistic ability and abstract reasoning. The cerebellum, traditionally associated with motor control, is active in motor learning. The basal ganglia are also key elements in reward-based learning. Data from studies of Broca's aphasia, Parkinson's disease, hypoxia, focal brain damage, and a genetically transmitted brain anomaly (the putative "language gene," family KE), and from comparative studies of the brains and behavior of other species, demonstrate that the basal ganglia sequence the discrete elements that constitute a complete motor act, syntactic process, or thought process. Imaging studies of intact human subjects and electrophysiologic and tracer studies of the brains and behavior of other species confirm these findings. As Dobzansky put it, "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" (cited in Mayr, 1982). That applies with as much force to the human brain and the neural bases of language as it does to the human foot or jaw. The converse follows: the mark of evolution on the brains of human beings and other species provides insight into the evolution of the brain bases of human language. The neural substrate that regulated motor control in the common ancestor of apes and humans most likely was modified to enhance cognitive and linguistic ability. Speech communication played a central role in this process. However, the process that ultimately resulted in the human brain may have started when our earliest hominid ancestors began to walk.
将语言的脑基础等同于布洛卡区和韦尼克区新皮质区域的传统理论是错误的。连接人类大脑皮质下结构和新皮质中解剖学上分离的神经元群体活动的神经回路,调节着诸如行走、说话和理解句子含义等复杂行为。当我们听到或读到一个单词时,参与该单词感知或现实世界联想的神经结构以及韦尼克区附近的后皮质区域都会被激活。新皮质和皮质下结构的许多区域支持赋予复杂句法能力、言语产生和大量词汇的皮质-纹状体-皮质回路。然而,这些结构中的许多也构成了调节行为其他方面的神经回路的一部分。例如,调节运动控制的基底神经节,也是赋予人类语言能力和抽象推理能力的回路中的关键要素。传统上与运动控制相关的小脑,在运动学习中是活跃的。基底神经节也是基于奖励学习的关键要素。来自布洛卡失语症、帕金森病、缺氧、局灶性脑损伤以及一种遗传传递的脑异常(假定的“语言基因”,KE家族)研究的数据,以及来自对其他物种大脑和行为的比较研究的数据表明,基底神经节对构成完整运动行为、句法过程或思维过程的离散元素进行排序。对完整人类受试者的成像研究以及对其他物种大脑和行为的电生理和示踪研究证实了这些发现。正如多布赞斯基所说:“生物学中没有任何东西是有意义的,除非从进化的角度来看”(引自迈尔,1982年)。这一点对于人类大脑和语言的神经基础,与对人类的脚或颌一样适用。反之亦然:人类和其他物种大脑上的进化印记,为洞察人类语言脑基础的进化提供了线索。调节猿类和人类共同祖先运动控制的神经基质很可能经过了改造,以增强认知和语言能力。言语交流在这个过程中发挥了核心作用。然而,最终导致人类大脑形成的过程可能始于我们最早的原始人类祖先开始行走的时候。