LeNoir M A
Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Natl Med Assoc. 1999 Aug;91(8 Suppl):1S-8S.
While the management of asthma has improved over the past two decades, the incidence of asthma in the inner city has not. The inner city, comprising a disproportionate number of people who live close to or below the poverty line, shows increased rates of morbidity and mortality from asthma. African Americans and Hispanic Americans are two to six times more likely to die from asthma than their white counterparts. When federally funded programs have targeted reducing morbidity and mortality in children from these populations, they have succeeded, but in a national study only 18 states had initiatives targeting asthma in low-income populations. This is tantamount to a public health crisis. Patients are not always properly diagnosed and are often without a regular source of health care, and symptoms are seen only in an acute context. Living conditions for the inner-city child have significant allergen triggers associated with house dust, cockroaches, cigarette smoke, chemical pollutants, and particulate matter. Viral infections, such as those caused by respiratory syncytial virus, are worse in crowded living conditions. The desirability of an increased public awareness of the seriousness of the disease and the need for chronic health care are issues that should be raised, through culturally relevant public means and in the knowledge that visual information is most effective. Physicians must understand the proper use of rescue and controller drugs, and asthma education must expand beyond doctors and nurses in their offices. The National Medical Association is committed to doing this aggressively, and community organizations, alliances, and coalitions must also aggressively follow. Public agencies must be lobbied to set high standards for proper asthma care and resources. With organizations acting in concert, the mortality and morbidity from asthma can be substantially prevented in the inner city.
在过去二十年里,哮喘的管理水平有所提高,但市中心城区的哮喘发病率却没有下降。市中心城区居住着大量接近或处于贫困线以下的人口,哮喘的发病率和死亡率呈上升趋势。非裔美国人和西班牙裔美国人死于哮喘的可能性是白人的两到六倍。当联邦资助项目旨在降低这些人群中儿童的发病率和死亡率时,项目取得了成功,但在一项全国性研究中,只有18个州有针对低收入人群哮喘问题的举措。这无异于一场公共卫生危机。患者往往没有得到正确诊断,而且常常没有固定的医疗保健来源,症状往往只在急性发作时才被发现。市中心城区儿童的生活环境中有大量与屋尘、蟑螂、香烟烟雾、化学污染物和颗粒物相关的过敏原触发因素。在拥挤的生活环境中,诸如呼吸道合胞病毒引起的病毒感染情况更糟。通过与文化相关的公共手段提高公众对该疾病严重性以及慢性医疗保健需求的认识是应该提出的问题,因为视觉信息最为有效。医生必须了解急救药物和控制药物的正确使用方法,哮喘教育必须超越医生和护士在办公室里进行的范围。全国医学协会致力于积极开展此项工作,社区组织、联盟和联合体也必须积极跟进。必须游说公共机构为适当的哮喘护理和资源设定高标准。各组织协同行动,市中心城区哮喘导致的死亡率和发病率就能大幅降低。