Krauss Stefan, Wang X T
Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Mar;132(1):3-22. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.3.
The Monty Hall problem (or three-door problem) is a famous example of a "cognitive illusion," often used to demonstrate people's resistance and deficiency in dealing with uncertainty. The authors formulated the problem using manipulations in 4 cognitive aspects, namely, natural frequencies, mental models, perspective change, and the less-is-more effect. These manipulations combined led to a significant increase in the proportion of correct answers given by novice participants, largely because of the synergy of frequency-based formulation and perspective change (Experiments 1, 2). In a raining study (Experiment 3) frequency formulation and mental models, but not Bayes's rule training, showed significant positive transfer in solving related problems.
蒙提霍尔问题(或三门问题)是一个著名的“认知错觉”例子,常被用来展示人们在应对不确定性时的抗拒和不足。作者通过在4个认知方面进行操作来构建该问题,即自然频率、心理模型、视角转换和少即是多效应。这些操作相结合,使新手参与者给出正确答案的比例显著增加,这主要归功于基于频率的表述和视角转换的协同作用(实验1、2)。在一项后续研究(实验3)中,频率表述和心理模型,而非贝叶斯规则训练,在解决相关问题时显示出显著的正向迁移。