De Neys Wim, Verschueren Niki
Lab Experimentele Psychologie, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Exp Psychol. 2006;53(2):123-31. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.1.123.
The Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD) is an intriguing example of the discrepancy between people's intuitions and normative reasoning. This study examines whether the notorious difficulty of the MHD is associated with limitations in working memory resources. Experiment 1 and 2 examined the link between MHD reasoning and working memory capacity. Experiment 3 tested the role of working memory experimentally by burdening the executive resources with a secondary task. Results showed that participants who solved the MHD correctly had a significantly higher working memory capacity than erroneous responders. Correct responding also decreased under secondary task load. Findings indicate that working memory capacity plays a key role in overcoming salient intuitions and selecting the correct switching response during MHD reasoning.
蒙提霍尔困境(MHD)是一个有趣的例子,说明了人们的直觉与规范推理之间的差异。本研究探讨了MHD臭名昭著的难度是否与工作记忆资源的限制有关。实验1和实验2检验了MHD推理与工作记忆容量之间的联系。实验3通过一项次要任务加重执行资源负担,从而对工作记忆的作用进行了实验测试。结果表明,正确解决MHD的参与者的工作记忆容量显著高于错误回答者。在次要任务负荷下,正确回答也会减少。研究结果表明,工作记忆容量在克服显著直觉并在MHD推理过程中选择正确的转换反应方面起着关键作用。